ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] AW: VStore Restore vmdk

2011-04-15 10:07:41
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: VStore Restore vmdk
From: Howard Coles <Howard.Coles AT ARDENTHEALTH DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:01:33 -0500
Great, nothing like, "improvements" to the client.  


See Ya'
Howard Coles Jr., RHCE, CNE, CDE
John 3:16!

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Andreas Kaiser
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 2:48 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] AW: VStore Restore vmdk

Same here. Performance was fine with client 6.2.2 (50 MB/s range) but restore 
performance dropped dramatically with 6.2.3 (2-3 MB/s range, decreasing with 
increasing disk size). It does not depend on the kind of datastore or access 
path as I tested both local ESX disks via LAN and different kinds of directly 
mapped SAN datastores. But I noticed that in 6.2.2, the backup files on the 
tape had full disk size whereas 6.2.3 uses 128MB chunks, likely to support 
incremental backups in the TDP product using change block tracking.

Monitoring the network data rate TSM to agent showed that the 128MB chunks are 
transferred at high speed, spaced apart by idle delays initially starting in 
the several minute range shrinking to 10 seconds near the end of each restored 
disk. To me it looks a bit like tape movement between each of those chunks. The 
same 128MB chunks are also noticable at backup time, although without those 
horrible gaps. Data was streaming in 6.2.2.

There is a case open at IBM, otherwise I'd try downgrading to 6.2.2.

Gruss, Andreas

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] Im Auftrag 
von Howard Coles
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 16:04
An: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Betreff: [ADSM-L] VStore Restore vmdk


I have a vmdk backup server setup using LAN free backups, and the vstore
API.  I have been able to backup a couple of vmdk files (full backup),
and that appeared to work pretty well.



However, when I try to restore the guest node I get very horrible
performance.  The initial restore appears to work, and the vm guest gets
created and the snapshot setup for restore.  But, when the actual data
transfer starts it will move about 35 to 60 MB at a time and then sit
and wait for long periods (average aggregate rate is 220 KB/s).   I have
a call open with IBM but they haven't been able to come back with
anything (completely devoid of response the last day or so) to resolve
the issue.

> Der neue SÜDKURIER. Weil Zukunft Tradition hat.
> Jetzt am Kiosk, im Internet und auf dem iPhone.
> Mehr Infos: http://www.suedkurier.de/relaunch

Die Auftragsabwicklung erfolgt auf Grundlage der jeweils gültigen AGB der 
beauftragten Unternehmen im SÜDKURIER Medienhaus (http://www.suedkurier.de/agb 
).
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>