Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool
2011-03-22 12:33:48
Interesting - didn't know there was that session limit on the DD!~
Thanks for the info!
W
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 11:25 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 03/22/2011
10:25:00 AM:
> From: "Prather, Wanda" <wPrather AT ICFI DOT COM>
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Date: 03/22/2011 10:25 AM
> Subject: Re: draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool Sent
> by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>
> Curious as to why you are using the disk pool with migration to DD
> instead of having your backups write directly to the DD.
>
> Wanda
1) We're still trying to make this puppy work (right now having problems
getting 10g direct connects to the TSM servers working).
2) For initial implementation we want to make as few changes as possible.
3) But the real reason is that we really like having backups buffered before
the next pool. This is especially true for Oracle archive logging.
We're thinking this is especially true for the DD which only has a single head
- nonredundant.
Now, we think we will send more directly to DD, just not at the start. And then
it will probably be via a limit on file size of the diskpool. That way it's
less playing with nodes and management classes. There is a limit to the number
of sessions the DD can handle concurrently (150), which includes backup,
restore, and replication sessions, and this limit is shared between two TSM
instances. We want to wait and see this all looks like before we jump too deep
into other changes. It seems best at the start to just change out tapepool for
filepool (with the required migration), see how it works, then see what else to
change to make things better.
. . . at least that's the plan . . .
Rick
-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool, (continued)
- Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool, Prather, Wanda
- [ADSM-L] Ang: Re: draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool, Daniel Sparrman
- Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool, Rick Adamson
- Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool, Richard Rhodes
- Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool, Hart, Charles A
- Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool, Richard Rhodes
- Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool,
Prather, Wanda <=
- Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool, Hart, Charles A
- Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool, Richard Rhodes
- Re: [ADSM-L] draining a diskpool when using a DD and no copypool, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
Re: [ADSM-L] how to delete old oracle backups at the tsm server, Wira Chinwong
|
|
|