ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange 2010

2011-01-26 08:04:50
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Exchange 2010
From: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:02:32 -0500
Robert,

Mailbox Restore requires that you are running on an Exchange Server.
It uses an Exchange Server "Recovery Database" in order to
perform the mailbox restore.

Thanks,

Del

----------------------------------------------------

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu> wrote on 01/26/2011
07:50:55 AM:

>> From: Robert Ouzen <rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL>
>> To: ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
>> Date: 01/26/2011 07:53 AM
>> Subject: Exchange 2010
>> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu>
>>
>> Hi to all
>>
>> I want to test the restore mailbox on for Exchange 2010 with the
>> new TDP 6.1.2 For Microsoft Exchange. I install the TDP on an
>> alternate machine and first tried to do some query's but got stuck.
>> In my alternate machine I didn't install any Microsoft Exchange
>> Server, just the tsm client and TDP.
>>
>> I run:
>>
>> tdpexcc query tsm *  /tsmnode=exchsrva_db    /fromexcserver=EXCHSRVA
>>
>> Got:
>>
>> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail:
>> Data Protection for Microsoft Exchange Server
>> Version 6, Release 1, Level 0.0
>> (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1998, 2009. All rights reserved.
>>
>> ACN5915W Unable to obtain the Microsoft Exchange Server version
>> running on your system. Microsoft Exchange 2003 is being assumed.
>> Unexpected results may occur.
>>
>> Querying Tivoli Storage Manager Server for a list of database
>> backups, please wait...
>>
>> Connecting to TSM Server as node 'exchsrva_db'...
>>
>> Please enter the password for node exchsrva_db:
>>
>> ***********
>>                              Backup List
>>                              -----------
>>
>>   Exchange Server  : EXCHSRVA
>>
>> ACN5820E There were no Exchange backups found on the Tivoli Storage
>> Manager server matching the specified criteria.
>>
>> I have at least 15 versions, when I run this command on the
>> production machine I got the correct result
>>
>> What I am missing? Any advice     ?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Robert Ouzen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>