I've not yet had the pleasure of upgrading from 6.1 to 6.2. The installer
(deployment engine) is supposed to take care of everything, but I also know
from experience that the DE is not IBM's best product.
Now, as for new installs, or upgrades from version 5, please skip 6.1, and
avoid at least one upgrade problem...
--
Gr., Remco
On 7 sep. 2010, at 23:01, "John D. Schneider" <john.schneider AT
COMPUTERCOACHINGCOMMUNITY DOT COM> wrote:
> Remco,
> If TSM 6.1 is dead, and everybody should just go to 6.2, then please
> respond to the user's posted problem. He was running 6.1 and tried to
> upgrade to 6.2.1.1, and had such a miserable failure that he ended up
> wiping out all his efforts and starting over. How does he get to 6.2 if
> the upgrade won't work?
> Can anybody else tell us about the 6.1 to 6.2 upgrade path? Is this
> user's experience isolated to Linux? Or is it a complete aberation for
> this user, but nobody else is getting this sort of problem during an
> upgrade?
>
> I have a customer who upgraded from 5.5.x to 6.1.0.0 (yes, I know, I
> have no idea why they installed that version) and of course they are
> unhappy about it. So they asked me today to upgrade it to a stable
> version, and I was going to suggest 6.1.4, since I have other customers
> stable on that release. But if it makes more sense to go straight to
> 6.2.1.1, I am happy to do that, but I would like to have some confidence
> in the upgrade path before I make my recommendation.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> John D. Schneider
> The Computer Coaching Community, LLC
> Office: (314) 635-5424 / Toll Free: (866) 796-9226
> Cell: (314) 750-8721
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] New server - 6.1.4.1 or 6.2.1.1?
> From: Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL>
> Date: Tue, September 07, 2010 2:22 pm
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>
> Repeat after me: TSM 6.1 is dead! :)
>
> Really, 6.1 is never a good choice, always go straight to 6.2.
>
> --
>
> Gr., Remco
>
> On 7 sep. 2010, at 20:39, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU> wrote:
>
>> I am putting up 2-new Linux based 6.x servers that will eventually replace
>> older 5.5.x boxes.
>>
>> My issue/question is........ should I go with 6.1.4.1 or 6.2.1.1?
>>
>> Part of the reason for asking this is due to my bad experience with trying
>> to upgrade a test server from 6.1.3.4 to 6.2.1 - total failure - upgrade
>> would not run to completion - kept telling me the database had issues
>> (eventhough it was a virgin, empty 6.1.3.4 instance just installed) and it
>> got so badly torqued when I tried to remove the half-install, I had to
>> have the OS guy just wipe it and start all over. Then I installed 6.2.1.1
>> virgin and it has been sitting there (waiting to have it shipped offsite).
>>
>> To date, I have not had any problems upgrading/patching my one production
>> 6.1.x server - just getting ready to upgrade from 6.1.3.4 to 6.1.4.1
>> (anyone else do this on a Linux platform ? Any problems?)
>>
>> Your thoughts?
>> Zoltan Forray
>> TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
>> Virginia Commonwealth University
>> UCC/Office of Technology Services
>> zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
>> Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
>> never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
>> security number or confidential personal information. For more details
>> visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
|
