On Aug 18, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Mehdi Salehi wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> stg1 has stg2 as copy pool and they are synced. If you set the copystg of
> stg1 to null, why stg2 still has copy data of stg1? Why doesn't TSM
> delete/expire the copy data?
Because it should not, according to the architecture.
The role of a copy storage pool is to retain a copy of data as long as that
data is in the primary pool from which it was copied.
|