ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] storage pool question

2010-04-18 08:06:03
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] storage pool question
From: ADSM-L <tsm AT NETWORKC.CO DOT UK>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 13:05:39 +0100
It certainly is possible, and often implemented in the case of clients
backing up large objects or LANfree clients, providing you have your
management class policies appropriately defined.

/David McClelland
London

On 18 Apr 2010, at 12:57, Mehdi Salehi <ezzobad AT GOOGLEMAIL DOT COM> wrote:

Hi all,
A tape-based storage pool is defined just as next pool of backuppool
and
archivepool. Can I assign this pool as the destination of some
clients, too?
It  means that pool would be capable of receiving some nodes' backup
data
directly and also be the nextstgpool of other pools?
IThat might cause contention if there are not enough tape drives,
but I
would like to know whether it is coceptually possible or not.

Thanks

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>