ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff

2009-10-12 13:15:56
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff
From: Olivier Levan <levan AT CA.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:13:50 -0600
Hi all,
for information, I've implemented snapdiff but in a TSM v6.1 only
environment (client and server) and we're going on production. There are a
couple of limitations and requirements (for ex. the ntfs support only, the
UTF8 page code, the permissions on the filer ...etc.) that you should be
careful and nothing is clearly documented ... but when it works, it works
fine!
Be aware that you'll have to be using latest version of Ontap (7.3.1.x).

Thanks,
_______________________________________________________

Olivier LEVAN, Infrastructure  IT Specialist
IBM Global Technology Services
227 - 11TH Avenue SW
CALGARY AB T2R 1R9
Tel.: (403) 539-3782
Fax: (845) 559-6763

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Remco Post
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 8:45 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] snapdiff

Andy,
A teammate successfully implemented snapdiff in our storage environment.
He used the 6.1 client with our TSM servers running on 5.5.1.0; his
setup works flawlessly. He will be presenting on snapdiff at the next
TSMUG.

BERTAUT TCHUISE
TSM/NetApp Storage Administrator
Legg Mason Technology Services
*410-580-7032
BTchuise AT leggmason DOT com


thanks. I'm aware of the official support issue, I'll urge the customer
to upgrade the servers to 5.5.


On 12 okt 2009, at 14:38, Andrew Raibeck wrote:

> The "Migrating from earlier versions" section near the beginning of
> the client manual discusses the topic of which servers are supported
> with the
> 5.5 client (5.5 or 6.1). Alternatively see
> http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21053218
>
> In theory the SnapDiff functionality should work with a 5.4 server (we

> are not aware of any feature-wise limitations in this regard).
> However, as the above item will indicate, 6.1 client and 5.4 server is

> not an officially supported configuration.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Andy
>
> Andy Raibeck
> IBM Software Group
> Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development Level 3 Team Lead
> Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Hartford/IBM@IBMUS Internet
> e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com
>
> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
> http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageM
> anager.html
>
>
> The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> The command line is your friend.
> "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 10/12/2009
> 06:46:53 AM:
>
>> [image removed]
>>
>> Re: snapdiff
>>
>> Remco Post
>>
>> to:
>>
>> ADSM-L
>>
>> 10/12/2009 06:47 AM
>>
>> Sent by:
>>
>> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>>
>> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
>>
>> On 12 okt 2009, at 12:36, Grigori Solonovitch wrote:
>>
>>> Have you tried to search in Internet?
>>>
>>> For  example:
>>>
>>> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?
>> rs=663&context=SSGSG7&uid=swg21392122&loc=en_US&cs=UTF-8&lang=en
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Where does this document list TSM server level requirements? I've
>> searched the TSM client manual, the TSM wiki and whatever google
>> could turn up. Since google reported that some people were actually
>> experimenting with snapdiff, I'd thought to ask the list as well....
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm currently looking into the snapdiff feature of the TSM 6.1
>>> client.
>>>
>>> My customer is still running TSM server version 5.4, so I was
>>> looking
>>>
>>> into the requirements for using the 6.1 client and the snapdiff
>>>
>>> feature. Does anyone know if there is any dependancy on a specific
>>>
>>> server version to be able to use the snapdiff feature?
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards,
>>
>> Remco Post
>> r.post AT plcs DOT nl

--
Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards,

Remco Post
r.post AT plcs DOT nl

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>