ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Per terabyte licensing

2009-09-26 12:04:40
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Per terabyte licensing
From: Skylar Thompson <skylar2 AT U.WASHINGTON DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:01:51 -0700
We're in that boat too. We have a GPFS cluster we expect to grow into
the petabyte range, so unless IBM sets the per-byte cost *really* low
we'll get hammered with that licensing scheme.

Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:
> Or more costly.  We have test VM servers with quad-core processors running
> 15-VM guests.   If I started counting by T-Bytes backed-up, it would cost
> a lot more than 4-CPU's!
>
>
>
> From:
> David Longo <David.Longo AT HEALTH-FIRST DOT ORG>
> To:
> ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Date:
> 09/25/2009 03:22 PM
> Subject:
> Re: [ADSM-L] Per terabyte licensing
> Sent by:
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>
>
>
> Haven't heard that.
> My first thought is that it would make licensing
> a LOT easier to figure out!
>
> David Longo
>
>>>> Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT JEFFERSONHOSPITAL DOT ORG> 9/25/2009 3:09 
>>>> PM
>>>>
>>>>
> Within the last few months there was a series of messages on counting
> processor cores. A couple of the messages stated that TSM is moving to
> licensing based on terabytes of stored data rather than processor
> cores. Where can I find more information on this?
>
>
> #####################################
> This message is for the named person's use only.  It may
> contain private, proprietary, or legally privileged information.
> No privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you
> receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and
> all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it,
> and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use,
> disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you
> are not the intended recipient.  Health First reserves the right to
> monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any views
> or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the
> individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views
> or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity;  and (2) the sender
> is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions.
> #####################################
>

--
-- Skylar Thompson (skylar2 AT u.washington DOT edu)
-- Systems Administrator, Genome Sciences Department
-- University of Washington, School of Medicine