ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Server Platform Upgrade

2008-12-04 14:22:30
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Server Platform Upgrade
From: Howard Coles <Howard.Coles AT ARDENTHEALTH DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:03:20 -0600
Go the P550 route.  I've seen P-series boxes handle 3 to 5 times the
amount of workload an Intel box can handle, and I'm a big fan of Linux.
I know more about Linux than I do AIX.  However, you need the right tool
for the job, and the P-series box will do the job, and do it longer.

On heavy I/O boxes I'm convinced that P-series is the way to go.
Especially if you can get the AIX box for the same price as the x86 box.
However, if not you'll need more than one x86 box to handle the load.

See Ya'
Howard


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
> Of Sam Sheppard
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:51 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] Server Platform Upgrade
> 
> We are currently running 3 TSM servers at Version 5.5, two on z/OS and
> the third on a Solaris 10 box.  We have been tasked to combine these
> into one.
> 
> The current Solaris system is on a Sun V240 w/8GB memory:
> 
>    Around 400 clients (combined) including a 3TB Exchange system, and
a
>       fairly large SAP implemtation in development on MS SQL Server,
>       several Oracle boxes, and a large number of Windows servers.
> 
>    Total database size (Solaris) is around 80GB, expiration runs about
>       two hours.  z/OS databases total 50GB.
> 
>    8 TS1120 tape drives in a 3494 ATL.
> 
>    1.2TB array for storage pools and database on the Solaris server
>       which we are currently trying to separate.
> 
>    Total daily backup volume is around 1TB with additional weekly
>       backups of 9TB.
> 
> I am the TSM guy and the z/OS systems programmer and as such don't
> really have a feel for hardware sizing or configuration on the Unix
> side
> of things and so have to rely on our Unix guys.  I suggested that AIX
> would be the preferred platform for this implementation with another
> Solaris box having the advantage of not requiring converting the
exist-
> ing one.  They came up with the following options with their favorite
> being the x86(HP) with Linux because it is much cheaper and they claim
> would be more powerful. The AIX and Sun configurations are similar in
> price at around 5 times the x86.
> 
> Thought, comments, considerations? What are people using for disk
> storage pools and would the internal drives on these boxes be
adequate?
> I'm also in the process of freeing one array on our ESS800 (Shark) for
> fiber connection to this configuration.
> 
> Here are the proposed options:
> 
> IBM Power 550 Express                HP DL380 G5
> Up to 8 cores and 256GB RAM          Up to 8 cores and 64GB RAM
> Six 300GB internal SAS 15k drives    Eight 146GB internal SAS 15k
> drives
> Three PCIe and two PCI-X slots       Four PCIe slots
> Dual port 10 GB Ethernet card
> 4 GB fiber channel cards - x2
> 
> Thanks
> Sam Sheppard
> San Diego Data Processing Corp.
> (858)-581-9668

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>