ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] DP for SQL Server 32 vs 64 bit

2008-11-14 10:47:55
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DP for SQL Server 32 vs 64 bit
From: Rick Harderwijk <rick.harderwijk AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:46:50 +0100
Hi,

In SQL server, the database is not processor architecture dependent, so that
will not be a limitation. I do not expect this to be an issue with TSM DP.
Unfortunately, I cannot test this at the moment, so I can't tell for sure.

Cheers,

Rick
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Loon, EJ van - SPLXM <
Eric-van.Loon AT klm DOT com> wrote:

> Dear TSM-ers,
> Could someone (Dell? ;-) ) let me know if it's supported to restore a
> database through a 32-bit DP for SQL Server client which was backed up
> on a different node running the 64-bit DP for SQL Server client.
> Thnak you very much for your reply in advance!!!
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
> only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part
> of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
> distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
> attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
> received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail, and delete this message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries
> and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or
> incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor
> responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal
> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with
> registered number 33014286
> **********************************************************************
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>