Allen S. Rout wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:20:48 +0200, Remco Post <r.post AT PLCS DOT NL> said:
>
>> Been there done that, you are right. Now, explain, why do we need a
>> backup volhist command then?
>
> Like the appendix on our large intestine.  Vestigial?
>
> Someone suggested "Well, now we write those every time something
> changes, let's remove the BACKUP VOLHIST command", and someone else at
> IBM had a spasm, thinking of all the admins with BACK VOLHIST in their
> schedules all failing, all calling support...
>

failing or just reporting 'obsolete' in the actlog? Anyway, It does have
it's use with the file= option.

> - Allen S. Rout


--
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post, PLCS