ADSM-L

[ADSM-L] Reconnects

2008-01-18 09:37:37
Subject: [ADSM-L] Reconnects
From: Mahesh Tailor <MTailor AT CARILION DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:36:45 -0500
Hello,
 
Running TSM 5.3.4.1 on AIX 5.3 TL5.
TSM BA Client: 5.3.4.0 [AIX 5.3 TL6]
 
I am backing up a large DB system from this node.  What I am seeing is whenever 
I try backup a very large file (>50GB) I get the following.
 
==================================================================================
Normal File-->    28,584,181,760 /epic/rel01/app/CACHE.DAT [Sent]
Normal File-->    57,482,936,320 /epic/rel01/er1ord/CACHE.DAT [Sent]
 
ANS1809W A session with the TSM server has been disconnected. An attempt will 
be made to reestablish the connection.
^MA Reconnection attempt will be made in 00:00:14 ^MA Reconnection attempt will 
be made in 00:00:13 ^MA Reconnection attempt will be made in 00:00:12 ^MA 
Reconnection attempt
will be made in 00:00:11 ^MA Reconnection attempt will be made in 00:00:10 ^MA 
Reconnection attempt will be made in 00:00:09 ^MA Reconnection attempt will be 
made in 00:00:08
^MA Reconnection attempt will be made in 00:00:07 ^MA Reconnection attempt will 
be made in 00:00:06 ^MA Reconnection attempt will be made in 00:00:05 ^MA 
Reconnection attempt
will be made in 00:00:04 ^MA Reconnection attempt will be made in 00:00:03 ^MA 
Reconnection attempt will be made in 00:00:02 ^MA Reconnection attempt will be 
made in 00:00:01
^MA Reconnection attempt will be made in 00:00:00 ... successful
Normal File-->       398,458,880 /epic/rel01/err/CACHE.DAT [Sent]
Normal File-->    51,589,939,200 /epic/rel01/pckept/CACHE.DAT [Sent]
 
ANS1809W A session with the TSM server has been disconnected. An attempt will 
be made to reestablish the connection.
Successful incremental backup of '/epic/rel01'
==================================================================================
 
BTW, CommTimeOut=3600 and IdleTimeOut=45.
 
Any file <50GB seems to go fine.  Has anyone seen this behavior?  Any 
suggestion to fix this?
 
Thanks,
 
Mahesh

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>