Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrading TSM Linux server
2007-10-24 11:25:31
Thanks for the confirmation. That was pretty much what I guessed. The
script seems to just check for license files and whether to perform a
"new" install versus an "upgrade".
Richard van Denzel <RvanDenzel AT SLTN DOT NL>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
10/24/2007 11:12 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
To
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Upgrading TSM Linux server
Hi Zoltan,
I always use "rpm -Uvh TIVsm-server-5.4.1-0.x86_64.rpm". I have had some
bad experiences with the install_server script in the past.
Btw, if you have both 5.1.4.2 and 5.1.4.0 rpm's in the same directory
you should be able to do just: "rpm -Uvh
TIVsm-server-5.4.1-2.x86_64.rpm".
Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards,
Richard van Denzel.
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: 24 October 2007 16:48
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Upgrading TSM Linux server
We recently started experiencing strange, unexplainable
(yes.......nothing
has changed since the server was installed) crashes (cores) with our
5.4.0.0 Linux-x64 server (3-within the last 24-hours - haven't had any
until now, since the server was installed 4-months ago).
So, I am going to install 5.4.1.0 and patch it to 5.4.1.2 since I see
lots
of crash issues addressed/resolved in 5.4.1.2
Is there any particular reason to use the "install_server" script or can
I
just "rpm -Uvh TIVsm-server-5.4.1-0.x86_64.rpm" ?
|
|
|