ADSM-L

[ADSM-L] SQL queries and TSM Server/platform performance measurement

2007-07-25 12:35:44
Subject: [ADSM-L] SQL queries and TSM Server/platform performance measurement
From: David McClelland <David.McClelland AT REUTERS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:47:59 +0100
Hi Guys,
 
Every now and then I come across a SQL query and a benchmark such as the
following which purports to be useful in high-level performance problem
spotting. For example:
 
select activity, cast((end_time) as date) as "Date", (examined/cast
((end_time-start_time) seconds as decimal(18,13))*3600) "Pages backed
up/Hr" from summary where activity='FULL_DBBACKUP' and days(end_time) -
days(start_time)=0
 
or
 
select activity, cast((end_time) as date) as "Date", (examined/cast
((end_time-start_time) seconds as decimal(24,2))*3600) "Objects Examined
Up/Hr" from summary where activity='EXPIRATION'
 
alongside statements that values of less than 5,000,000 pages per hour
and 3,800,000 pages per hour respectively might indicate a performance
issue somewhere in the stack. Has anyone else seen these, or similar
ones, as well? 
 
My concern is that the article I've just come across which contains the
above, quoted from an IBM White Paper, might be a little on the old
side, and particularly with the later expiration query, I'm getting
figures for one system which suggest it should be crawling on its knees
when instead I'd tend to think it's a pretty damn good performer. As I'm
sure TSM Server code improves the expiration algorithm with each
revision, then it's more likely that this later query, and as
importantly the benchmark which goes with it, might get obsoleted.
 
Does any one have any thoughts on these? Does anyone else have any other
queries or benchmarks which they run from time to time for
'tip-of-the-iceberg' performance troubleshooting.
 
Rgds,
 
David McClelland
London, UK
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


This email was sent to you by Reuters, the global news and information company. 
To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, 
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters 
Limited.

Reuters Limited is part of the Reuters Group of companies, of which Reuters 
Group PLC is the ultimate parent company.
Reuters Group PLC - Registered office address: The Reuters Building, South 
Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5EP, United Kingdom
Registered No: 3296375
Registered in England and Wales

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>