ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] New Linux server issues

2007-06-05 15:10:03
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] New Linux server issues
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:09:09 -0400
If you are talking about the ulimit values, most are set to unlimited:

[root@fireball ~]# ulimit -a
core file size          (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size           (kbytes, -d) unlimited
file size               (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending signals                 (-i) 1024
max locked memory       (kbytes, -l) 32
max memory size         (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files                      (-n) 1024
pipe size            (512 bytes, -p) 8
POSIX message queues     (bytes, -q) 819200
stack size              (kbytes, -s) 10240
cpu time               (seconds, -t) unlimited
max user processes              (-u) 71680
virtual memory          (kbytes, -v) unlimited
file locks                      (-x) unlimited


BTW, this is a x64 install.

----------------------------------------------------
Zoltan Forray
Virginia Commonwealth University
Office of Technology Services
University Computing Center
e-mail: zforray AT vcu DOT edu
voice: 804-828-4807



Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
06/05/2007 03:03 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


To
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc

Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] New Linux server issues






On Jun 5, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:

> I see a lot of these message are related to memory. This box has
> 8GB or
> RAM. One would think that was enough.

Zoltan -

That's a physical resource.  But what about the Unix Resource Limits
which may have been in effect when the server process started, and
could artificially limit what the process may use?  Your posting
doesn't mention that factor, so something worth checking.

    Richard Sims