Hi Len, 

Following messages are recorded on the server. 


04/04/2007 01:59:54      ANR0484W Session 162177 for node AAUNSW920
(WinNT)
                          terminated - protocol violation detected.
04/04/2007 02:00:09      ANR0406I Session 162388 started for node
AAUNSW920 (WinNT)
                          (Tcp/Ip 172.16.102.13(1909)).
04/04/2007 02:32:13      ANR0406I Session 162474 started for node
AAUNSW920 (WinNT)
                          (Tcp/Ip 172.16.102.13(1972)).
04/04/2007 02:45:08      ANR0481W Session 162033 for node AAUNSW920
(WinNT)
                          terminated - client did not respond within
7200 seconds.
04/04/2007 02:51:05      ANR0481W Session 162165 for node AAUNSW920
(WinNT)
                          terminated - client did not respond within
7200 seconds.
04/04/2007 03:30:25      ANR0403I Session 162474 ended for node
AAUNSW920 (WinNT). 


Appreciate your feedback.


Dinesh Pahari



-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Len Boyle
Sent: Wednesday, 4 April 2007 10:59 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] ANS1809W

 Hello Dinesh, 

Check the the server logs and see if you find the answer. I would guess
that there is a timeout message. 

len

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Pahari, Dinesh P
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:30 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] ANS1809W

Hi All, 

Even though the backup was completed successfully, following errors were
reported on the dsmerror.log file. 

4/04/2007 00:37:44 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -50
04/04/2007 00:37:44 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session
reopen procedure.
04/04/2007 00:37:44 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session
reopen procedure.
04/04/2007 00:37:59 ANS1810E TSM session has been reestablished.

I couldn't find any network issue (eg.duplicate ip addresses, NIC speed,
route etc). Please advice me what could have caused the above issue. 

Regards, 

Dinesh Pahari