ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Collocation groups and offsite reclamation

2006-12-14 13:31:59
Subject: Re: Collocation groups and offsite reclamation
From: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:31:15 -0500 
>> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:01:26 -0500, Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT 
>> JEFFERSONHOSPITAL DOT ORG> said:

> There were just the two tape pools mentioned in my original posting.
> Copy pool volumes were sent to an offsite vault. Primary pool
> volumes remained onsite.

I believe what TSM does is order the primary mounts by which volumes
have the most data to be moved in the current reclamation process.


- Allen S. Rout
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: ADSM on z/OS Mainframe Tape Handling, Shannon Bach
Next by Date:  Increasing the DISKPOOL, Jones, Eric J
Previous by Thread:  Re: Collocation groups and offsite reclamation, Thomas Denier
Next by Thread:  ANR999D shmcomm.c(1826) error, Joni Moyer
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]