-----Allen S. Rout wrote: -----

>>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:55:51 -0500, Thomas Denier
>
>> My site once had a primary tape pool and a copy tape pool used for
>> some of our larger clients, with both of these pools collocated by
>> node. Offsite reclamation was a painful experience.
>
>Can you describe your config in slightly greater detail?  You say
>'offsite reclamation', but I'm not clear where the offsite happened;
>if the copy pool was offsite, that's one thing.  If the offsite pool
>was yet-another pool, that's different.

There were just the two tape pools mentioned in my original posting.
Copy pool volumes were sent to an offsite vault. Primary pool volumes
remained onsite.