ADSM-L

Re: CAD Control Client scheduler

2006-10-13 07:16:18
Subject: Re: CAD Control Client scheduler
From: Richard van Denzel <r.vandenzel AT BSU DOT NL>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:15:04 +0200
Ian,

Both options are best practices. According to IBM one should use the CAD
to control the scheduler (on Netware I would advise it as well).

Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards,
 
Richard van Denzel

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] Namens Smith,
I (Ian)
Verzonden: vrijdag 13 oktober 2006 12:59
Aan: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] CAD Control Client scheduler

Hello

Do people use the CAD to control the scheduler? Is this a good idea,
what happens if the CAD fails?

Is this best practice?


_____________________________
Ian Smith
SAN/TSM Specialist


_____________________________________________________________

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally
privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention
of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in
error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that
disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we
have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in
this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
arising from the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any
liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any
actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or
its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in
writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as
an invitation to treat.
_____________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>