ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: multiple tape processes for offsite volumes

2006-04-26 13:53:44
Subject: Re: multiple tape processes for offsite volumes
From: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:50:49 -0400 
On Apr 26, 2006, at 1:13 PM, David E Ehresman wrote:


"backup stgpool" has had the maxprocess parm for some time now. ...


Indeed so.  The fly in the ointment is that you don't necessarily get
the number of processes you specify, for architectural reasons.

See contemporary IBM Technote 1234463.

    Richard Sims
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Activity log filtering, ignorable messages, &c., Allen S. Rout
Next by Date:  Re: Recommended policy for single drive scenario, Muhammad Sadat Anwar
Previous by Thread:  Re: multiple tape processes for offsite volumes, David E Ehresman
Next by Thread:  Re: multiple tape processes for offsite volumes, Schaub, Steve
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]