Re: Backup stgpool peculiarity
2006-02-10 09:26:36
On other thing I noticed : There are no drives in use at all when I launch the
command, so why not launch the four threads if there is no tape drive
contention ?
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Mochnaczewski
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:24 AM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Backup stgpool peculiarity
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the info. What's even stranger is I can launch the same type of
process using another storage pool ( backup stgpool prd_disk prd_dr maxpr=4 )
and it WILL use 4 tape drives and multithread ?!?!?!?
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:12 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup stgpool peculiarity
On Feb 10, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Richard Mochnaczewski wrote:
> Why does it always default to one process instead of multiple
> sessions as I initiate ?
A question that keeps coming up... Some prevailing factors:
The operation is node-oriented, which limits the actual number of
operating processes; and the operation is inherently limited in the
realities of serial-access media (see IBM Technote 1208545).
Richard Sims
|
|
|