Re: Domino Client question
2006-01-26 10:49:20
Aaah, does the 'retextra' option override the 'versions data exists'? The
'retextra' for the default backup copy group is 30 and the 'versions data
exists' is set to 7. But I assume if the databases are only backed up fully
each week, there would never be any more than 4-5 active/inactive copies?
Is my thinking correct?
Thanks
Farren
|-----------------------------+-------------------------------------------|
| Helder Garcia | |
| <helder.garcia AT GMAIL DOT COM> |
|
| Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor | To|
| Manager" | [email protected]|
| <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> | ARIST.EDU
|
| | cc|
| 26/01/2006 15:14 | |
| | Subject|
| Please respond to | Re: |
| "ADSM: Dist Stor | [ADSM-L] |
| Manager" | Domino |
| <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> | Client
|
| | question |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|-----------------------------+-------------------------------------------|
Check "Retextra" option on copygroup too.
On 1/26/06, Farren Minns <fminns AT wiley.co DOT uk> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> A user is trying to restore a lotus domino database on a Windows NT
server,
> and when we look at active/inactive files, there are only five (we do
full
> backups every weekend). So, my question here is where is it getting the
> 'keep 5 copies' from. The normal backup copy group for the server keeps 7
> copies of all normal files, so I'm assuming it can't be this.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Farren
>
>
>
> ######################################################################
> The information contained in this e-mail and any subsequent
> correspondence is private and confidential and intended solely
> for the named recipient(s). If you are not a named recipient,
> you must not copy, distribute, or disseminate the information,
> open any attachment, or take any action in reliance on it. If you
> have received the e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete
> the e-mail.
>
> Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
> individual sender, unless otherwise stated. Although this e-mail has
> been scanned for viruses you should rely on your own virus check, as
> the sender accepts no liability for any damage arising out of any bug
> or virus infection.
> ######################################################################
>
--
Helder Garcia
######################################################################
The information contained in this e-mail and any subsequent
correspondence is private and confidential and intended solely
for the named recipient(s). If you are not a named recipient,
you must not copy, distribute, or disseminate the information,
open any attachment, or take any action in reliance on it. If you
have received the e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete
the e-mail.
Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
individual sender, unless otherwise stated. Although this e-mail has
been scanned for viruses you should rely on your own virus check, as
the sender accepts no liability for any damage arising out of any bug
or virus infection.
######################################################################
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Deleting a Volume in TSM, Kleynerman, Arthur
- Re: Deleting a Volume in TSM, Kurt Beyers
- Domino Client question, Farren Minns
- Re: Domino Client question, Helder Garcia
- Re: Domino Client question,
Farren Minns <=
- Re: Domino Client question, Del Hoobler
- Re: Domino Client question, Farren Minns
- Re: Domino Client question, Del Hoobler
- Re: Domino Client question, Farren Minns
- Mac 5.2.3.12 point in time problem, Farren Minns
- Re: Mac 5.2.3.12 point in time problem, Richard Sims
- Re: Mac Client 5.2.3.12 point in time problem, Farren Minns
- Re: Mac Client 5.2.3.12 point in time problem, Richard Sims
- Re: Mac Client 5.2.3.12 point in time problem, Farren Minns
- Serious performance problems with large BUFPOOLSIZE, Matthew Glanville
|
|
|