Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new
2006-01-24 09:05:53
>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:16:06 -0500, Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>
>> said:
> At 06:56 AM 1/23/2006, Dirk Kastens wrote:
>> Paul Zarnowski schrieb:
>>> TSM does not do round-robin allocation
>>> of DB pages across it's volumes. It fills up one, then works on the
>>> next.
>> Are you shure? I think this only applies to log volumes.
> That's the way it was explained to me years ago. Easy enough to
> test, I guess. Start a new server with a few empty db volumes, and
> watch the I/O activity.
Paul's got it. Even with a non-new server, take a look at Q DBVOL
f=d. It'll be quite unusual to have more than one volume partially
full. If TSM assigned pages round-robin, then the usual case would be
(fairly) even byte occupancy per volume.
In fact, you can observe just this in DISK volumes in a primary
stgpool; if you build a stgpool out of disparate sizes, the small ones
will get full first.
- Allen S. Rout
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- DB & LOG Volume layout - new, David Longo
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Jack Coats
- Message not available
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Dirk Kastens
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new,
Allen S. Rout <=
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Dirk Kastens
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Allen S. Rout
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Lloyd Dieter
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Richard Rhodes
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Allen S. Rout
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Richard Rhodes
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Tab Trepagnier
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Dirk Kastens
- Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Allen S. Rout
Re: DB & LOG Volume layout - new, Paul van Dongen
|
|
|