ADSM-L

Re: -nodename no longer there for UNIX...

2006-01-18 11:14:17
Subject: Re: -nodename no longer there for UNIX...
From: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:16:24 -0700
Eric, yes, I have already forwarded this to our doc folks. Like -nodename,
-tcpserveraddress has never been supported from the Unix command line.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html


The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 01/18/2006
09:03:46 AM:

> Hi Andy!
> Thank you very much for your reply!
> Bummer... This requires me to alter (add the stanza) the dsm.sys which
> was something I wanted to prevent for an occasional restore...
> I didn't see this listed in the APAR, but that parameter also seems to
> be incorrectly documented then, right?
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:storman AT US.IBM DOT COM]
> Sent: woensdag 18 januari 2006 16:50
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: -nodename no longer there for UNIX...
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Nope, -tcpserveraddress is also not valid from the command line.
>
> Instead, use the -SERVERNAME option, which refers to a stanza in dsm.sys
> that identifies the TSM server.
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy
>
> Andy Raibeck
> IBM Software Group
> Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
> Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com
>
> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
> http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorag
> eManager.html
>
>
> The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> The command line is your friend.
> "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 01/18/2006
> 08:43:42 AM:
>
> > Hi Andy (and of course Richard!)!
> > Thank you very much for your reply!
> > I thought that all parameters were equal across all clients, but I was
> > wrong.
> > The VIRTUALNODE parameter appears to do exactly what I want, but now
> > another issue arises. I would like to create a single line command to
> do
> > a cross client restore and my clients are spread across two TSM
> servers.
> > So I thought of using the -TCPSERVERADDRESS parameter to cover this.
> > I issue the following command:
> > Dsmc -virtualnode=<sourcenode> -tcpserveradddress=<TSM source server>
> > This results in a:
> > ANS1108E Invalid option (-TCPSERVERADDRESS) for the LOOP command
> > The manual GC32-0789-05 states that it is a valid option...
> > Thank you very much for your help!
> > Kindest regards,
> > Eric van Loon
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:storman AT US.IBM DOT COM]
> > Sent: woensdag 18 januari 2006 14:50
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject: Re: -nodename no longer there for UNIX...
> >
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Of course, NODENAME remains a valid option for the dsm.sys file. It
> has
> > never been valid from the command line. IC46024 seems to refer to only
> a
> > doc error.
> >
> > You can try -VIRTUALNODENAME from the command line
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > Andy Raibeck
> > IBM Software Group
> > Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> > Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
> > Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com
> >
> > IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
> >
> http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorag
> > eManager.html
> >
> >
> > The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> > The command line is your friend.
> > "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
> >
> > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 01/18/2006
> > 06:32:15 AM:
> >
> > > Hi *SM-ers!
> > > Does anybody know why IBM decided to drop the -nodename parameter
> for
> > > the UNIX clients?
> > > I discovered that this parameter no longer works in 5.3. It's
> > documented
> > > in the manuals but that's not correct (IC46024).
> > > I'm trying to find a way to give our standby a way to restore data
> > from
> > > another node, without the help of a TSM admin. I know there is a
> > > -fromnode parameter, but that requires a lot of extra work
> (accessing
> > > the source node, updating the node access list, restoring the file
> on
> > > the target server, again accessing the source server, removing the
> > node
> > > from the access list). It would be so much easier when one could use
> > the
> > > -nodename parameter! And I really cannot think of any reason why it
> > was
> > > dropped!
> > > I would like to know how other people solve this. Thanks in advance
> > for
> > > any reply!
> > > Kindest regards,
> > > Eric van Loon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> **********************************************************************
> > > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> > > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
> > > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
> > > only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of
> > > the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
> > > distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
> > > attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
> > > received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
> > > by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart
> > > Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall
> > > not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this
> > > e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> > >
> **********************************************************************
> >
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
> > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
> > only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of
> > the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
> > distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
> > attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
> > received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
> > by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart
> > Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall
> > not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this
> > e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> > **********************************************************************
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee
> only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of
> the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or
> distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
> attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
> received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart
> Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall
> not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this
> e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> **********************************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>