Re: Running tapes off-site multiple times in a day?
2006-01-06 17:25:35
>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:39:29 -0500, "Kauffman, Tom" <KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT
>> COM> said:
> The interaction forced me to think through the actuall issues and work
> out what *looks* like a viable way to handle the process. With a bit of
> luck, I will be in a position to try my ideas out in early February, and
> I'll report back as to whether things have worked out.
Buy us plane tickets, and we'll all come and second-guess you.
Watching all the advice (including mine) , I was reminded of a Dilbert
in which PHB is telling him which way to move the mouse. :)
- Allen S. Rout
- No, no! LEFT!
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Running tapes off-site multiple times in a day?, (continued)
- Re: Running tapes off-site multiple times in a day?, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: Running tapes off-site multiple times in a day?, Nicholas Cassimatis
- Re: Running tapes off-site multiple times in a day?, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: Running tapes off-site multiple times in a day?, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: Running tapes off-site multiple times in a day?, Mueller, Ken
- Re: Running tapes off-site multiple times in a day?, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: Running tapes off-site multiple times in a day?, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: Running tapes off-site multiple times in a day?, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: Running tapes off-site multiple times in a day?,
Allen S. Rout <=
|
|
|