ADSM-L

Re: Resource utilization on TSM server 5.3.2.0

2005-11-09 04:07:48
Subject: Re: Resource utilization on TSM server 5.3.2.0
From: Helder Garcia <helder.garcia AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 06:07:34 -0300
I don't know behind the scenes, but some default values of
memory/buffers configurations had been increased.

On 11/9/05, Henrik Wahlstedt <SHWL AT statoil DOT com> wrote:
> :-)
>
> Yes you are right. But I know that my Server also utilize resources like 
> buffpoolsize, cpu and I/O.
> Maybe resource utilization wasn´t the best choice of words since it is a 
> client option. ;-)
>
> So, have anyone seen any drastic changes in memory, cpu and I/O usage on a 
> 5.3 server?
>
> //Henrik
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Stapleton, Mark
> Sent: den 9 november 2005 01:37
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Resource utilization on TSM server 5.3.2.0
>
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Henrik Wahlstedt
> >I havent read anything about resource utilization on TSM server 5.3. My
> >questions are. Will 5.3 use/need more memory,  CPU and/or I/O?
> >
> >Most of the times when I upgrade my systems one or more HW components
> >need to be upgraded as well...
>
> Keep in mind that resourceutilization is a client function, not a server 
> function.
>
> --
> Mark Stapleton (stapleton AT berbee DOT com)
> IBM Certified Advanced Deployment Professional  Tivoli Storage Management 
> Solutions 2005 IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert (CATE) AIX Berbee 
> Information Networks Office 262.521.5627
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you.
>


--
Helder Garcia

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>