ADSM-L

Re: Discrepancy select vs. q act

2005-06-23 10:24:25
Subject: Re: Discrepancy select vs. q act
From: Dave Zarnoch <zarnocd AT NATIONWIDEPROVIDENT DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:22:52 -0400
Sorry.....

Server Version 5, Release 1, Level 6.2

DaveZ




                      Richard Sims
                      <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>             To:       ADSM-L AT 
VM.MARIST DOT EDU
                      Sent by: "ADSM:          cc:
                      Dist Stor                Subject:  Re: [ADSM-L] 
Discrepancy select vs. q act
                      Manager"
                      <[email protected]
                      .EDU>


                      06/23/2005 10:09
                      AM
                      Please respond to
                      "ADSM: Dist Stor
                      Manager"






When posting such questions, please include the level of the software
involved, as the problem may be corrected in an available APAR...
See APAR IC34462 as a possible fix for this.

    Richard Sims

On Jun 23, 2005, at 9:56 AM, Dave Zarnoch wrote:

> Folks....I have a problem when creating a report:
>
>
> Using "q act begind=-1 se=PROV1010":
>
> 06/23/05   02:19:35      ANE4961I (Session: 201, Node: PROV1010)
> Total
> number of
>                           bytes transferred:     2.14 GB
>
>
> Using "select * from summary":
>
>
> START_TIME: 2005-06-23 00:48:03.000000
>      END_TIME: 2005-06-23 02:19:35.000000
>      ACTIVITY: BACKUP
>        NUMBER: 201
>        ENTITY: PROV1010
>      COMMMETH: Tcp/Ip
>       ADDRESS: 172.28.254.70:32385
> SCHEDULE_NAME: PROV1010
>      EXAMINED: 1103951
>      AFFECTED: 2727
>        FAILED: 2
>         BYTES: 0
>          IDLE: 0
>        MEDIAW: 0
>     PROCESSES: 1
>    SUCCESSFUL: YES
>   VOLUME_NAME:
>    DRIVE_NAME:
>
> Why is the select statement giving me 0 bytes instead of 2.14GB
>
> Am I missing something here?
>
> Thanks!
>
> DaveZ
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>