ADSM-L

Re: Discrepancy select vs. q act

2005-06-23 10:08:44
Subject: Re: Discrepancy select vs. q act
From: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 07:08:28 -0700
You don't mention version numbers of the TSM components. However, IC33840
might explain the trouble (go to www.ibm.com and search on IC33840).

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.



Dave Zarnoch <zarnocd AT NATIONWIDEPROVIDENT DOT COM>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
2005-06-23 06:56
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc

Subject
Discrepancy select vs. q act






Folks....I have a problem when creating a report:


Using "q act begind=-1 se=PROV1010":

06/23/05   02:19:35      ANE4961I (Session: 201, Node: PROV1010)  Total
number of
                          bytes transferred:     2.14 GB


Using "select * from summary":


START_TIME: 2005-06-23 00:48:03.000000
     END_TIME: 2005-06-23 02:19:35.000000
     ACTIVITY: BACKUP
       NUMBER: 201
       ENTITY: PROV1010
     COMMMETH: Tcp/Ip
      ADDRESS: 172.28.254.70:32385
SCHEDULE_NAME: PROV1010
     EXAMINED: 1103951
     AFFECTED: 2727
       FAILED: 2
        BYTES: 0
         IDLE: 0
       MEDIAW: 0
    PROCESSES: 1
   SUCCESSFUL: YES
  VOLUME_NAME:
   DRIVE_NAME:

Why is the select statement giving me 0 bytes instead of 2.14GB

Am I missing something here?

Thanks!

DaveZ

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>