ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

File dev. type vs. VTL

2005-06-17 13:47:42
Subject: File dev. type vs. VTL
From: "Thorneycroft, Doug" <dthorneycroft AT LACSD DOT ORG>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:46:56 -0700 
I'm getting ready to add more disk to my TSM server,
Are there any advatage/disadvatages to using a Virtual tape library
instead of TSM defined file device types.
(Do TSM file device types work with multi session restores?)

Doug Thorneycroft
> Systems Analyst
> County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
> 1955 Workman Mill Road
> Whittier, CA 90601
> Tel: (562)699-7411, Ext. 1058
> Fax:(562)695-6756 
> www.lacsd.org
> 
>
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: MacOS: duplicate volume label encountered, Richard Sims
Next by Date:  Re: 15,000,000 + files on one directory backup, Egon Blouder
Previous by Thread:  MacOS: duplicate volume label encountered, Heinz Flemming
Next by Thread:  Re: File dev. type vs. VTL, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]