In TSM for Databases, each backup file has a unique name and rman is
responsible for "deleting" them, thus triggering the TSM expiration cycle.
Does Backtrack work the same way?
>>> Larry_Clark AT THRUWAY.STATE.NY DOT US 05/19/05 2:34 PM >>>
Hi:
We've just discovered q peculiar problem with expiration involing the
SQL-BACKTRACK product and SYBASE and ORACLE databases. They do not
appear to be expiring.
The managment class rules are:
DOMAIN_NAME CLASS_NAME VEREXISTS VERDELETED RETEXTRA
RETONLY DESTINATION
SPAIX DBBKUP1 60 0 30 0 AIXDISKBACK
And a "query backup /BACKTRACK:obackups.physical/*/* -inactive" returns
a HUGE list of files that are inactive.
They should all have been deleted with the RETONLY set to 0.
Am I missing something?
A DB called SQL-BACKTRACK support and the responce was SQL-BACKTRACK
marked them inactive; at that point TSM
is not correctly removing them per the definitions.
Flat files in other management groups are behaving correctly.....
API 5,242,880 B 10/15/03 02:54:53 DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.15-10-2003.02:55:41-21544
API 5,242,880 B 11/15/03 02:59:13 DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.15-11-2003.02:59:04-43356
API 5,242,880 B 12/15/02 02:55:59 DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.15-12-2002.02:55:42-31662
API 5,242,880 B 12/15/03 02:50:43 DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.15-12-2003.02:50:28-19182
API 5,242,880 B 01/16/03 03:03:22 DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-01-2003.03:03:16-32618
API 5,242,880 B 01/16/04 02:57:23 DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-01-2004.02:57:00-28874
API 5,242,880 B 02/16/03 02:48:22 DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-02-2003.02:48:26-21274
API 5,242,880 B 02/16/04 02:48:41 DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-02-2004.02:48:10-39458
API 5,242,880 B 03/16/03 02:50:47 DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-03-2003.02:50:59-32472
API 5,242,880 B 03/16/04 02:54:33 DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
sical/BRSSBKUP/controlfiles-0.16-03-2004.02:54:33-33320
API 5,242,880 B 04/16/03 03:04:45 DBBKUP1 A
/BACKTRACK:obackups.phy
>>> Darren AT BASCO DOT COM 05/10/2005 9:27:12 AM >>>
Mario,
We've been using St. Bernard OFM 9 in conjuction with TSM 5.2.2
(client vers. of course) to backup both our GroupWise 6, and now
GroupWise 6.5 servers in the last year without problems. We've also done
successful restores of the GroupWise servers.
>>> mariobehring AT YAHOO DOT COM 05/09/05 3:41 PM >>>
Hi list,
I need to perform an online backup of a Novell Groupwise environment
using
TSM ... does anybody knows how can I accomplish this ?
Thanks.
Mario
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
|