ADSM-L

Re: Does an inactive client need a licence

2005-01-26 19:05:48
Subject: Re: Does an inactive client need a licence
From: TSM_User <tsm_user AT YAHOO DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:05:37 -0800
John,
I would contact your local Tivoli rep and pose this question to them.  Tivoli 
for a while now has been processor based for licensing. So if you no longer 
have the TSM client installed and running on those servers then it doesn't make 
sense that you should be paying maintenance or anything for that matter for 
those nodes.  This is one of the reasons why they did away with the current 
license tracking in TSM at V5.3.

Another interesting point.  If you were using something like VMWare and had 4 
clients on one physical dual processor server you would pay for a single 2 
processor license.  Even though you have 4 installations of the TSM client.

This can have a negative effect as well.  If you have 4 VM's on an 8 way and 
want to purchase the TDP for SQL for just one of the VM's you still have to pay 
for the 8 process license of the TDP.

Of course pricing can be different from customer to customer and location to 
location so really only  your local Tivoli rep can tell you exactly what you 
are required to do.

"Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM> wrote:
Hi John!
TSM's license counter starts counting as soon as a client starts backing up.
A license is not returned until all the client's data has been removed from
the server. So, as long as the inactive clients are storing data on your TSM
server (no matter how old), you are using a license...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


-----Original Message-----
From: John Naylor [mailto:John.Naylor AT SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO DOT UK]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 11:08
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Does an inactive client need a licence


People,
My question is I have just run audit licence and it shows as audited the
number of registered clients
However a number of registered clients have not backed up for a few
months.
My question is do these inactive clients need a licence
Does anyone know IBM's official take on this.
thanks.,
John



**********************************************************************
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern
Energy Group.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of
the error in transmission. Unless specifically stated otherwise, this email
(or any attachments to it) is not an offer capable of acceptance or
acceptance of an offer and it does not form part of a binding contractual
agreement.


Scottish Hydro-Electric, Southern Electric, SWALEC and S+S
are trading names of the Scottish and Southern Energy Group.
**********************************************************************


**********************************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), 
its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or 
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
any delay in receipt.
**********************************************************************

                
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>