ADSM-L

Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?

2005-01-26 17:32:44
Subject: Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?
From: "Rushforth, Tim" <TRushforth AT WINNIPEG DOT CA>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:32:21 -0600
Thanks Jurgen:

Please keep us posted on this (apar # etc.).

I would want this fixed before I go to 5.3.

Thanks,

Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg

-----Original Message-----
From: Jurjen Oskam [mailto:jurjen-tsm AT STUPENDOUS DOT ORG] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 3:51 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Anyone installed 5.3 yet?

On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:48:26AM -0500, Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU wrote:

> When the 5.3 server starts existing FILE volumes in FILLING state are
> marked  as full.

I read this to mean that when the 5.3 server starts *for the first time*
after an upgrade, FILE volumes in FILLING state would be marked as full.

However: that is not the problem I'm having. When I define a smallish
FILE volume (64 MB), in certain cases it fills up after only 0,5% usage.
This caused my stgpool that is used as the destination of the DIRMC
option to *really quickly* fill up after migrating to 5.3. Also,
offsite reclamation started issuing errors reporting it couldn't access
onsite versions of the objects it was reclaiming on offsite volumes.
All the objects it couldn't access on onsite volumes should have been
in the affected stgpool.

IBM has reproduced this problem and is analyzing it.

--
Jurjen Oskam
  "E-mail has just erupted like a weed, and instead of considering
  what to say when they write, people now just let thoughts drool
  out onto the screen." - R. Craig Hogan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>