ADSM-L

AW: Sub-File Backup - 2 GB Limit

2004-12-29 08:27:22
Subject: AW: Sub-File Backup - 2 GB Limit
From: Salak Juraj <J.Salak AT ASAMER DOT AT>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 14:26:54 +0100
Hi,

maybe a year ago I asked the same question and of of TSM programmers responded 
that this vere not a complicated technical issue but the developers would need 
an official requirement for it in order to do it.
I was too lazy and / or busy to open an official requirement.

best regards
Juraj Salak
 

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] Im 
> Auftrag von Rushforth, Tim
> Gesendet: Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 18:24
> An: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Betreff: Sub-File Backup - 2 GB Limit
> 
> Hi:
> 
>  
> 
> Just curious if anyone knows if this limit has changed or 
> will change in the future?
> 
> We have some users asking about it.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> 
> Tim Rushforth
> 
> City of Winnipeg
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Forum:   ADSM.ORG - ADSM / TSM Mailing List Archive 
>  Date:      2003, Jan 06 
>  From:      Jim Smith <nobody at nowhere.com
> <mailto:nobody%20at%20nowhere.com> > 
> 
> Tim,
>  
> Actually, two different behaviors based on two-different problems.
> Files
> that start less then 2 GB but grow > 2 GB will continue to 
> use subfile backup as long as the other requirements for the 
> base file (i.e., the file on the client cache) is still 
> valid.  The limiting factor here is that there is only 32-bit 
> support in the differencing subsystem that we are using.  We 
> chose 2 GB on the onset (instead of 4 GB) as the limit to 
> avoid any possible boundary problems near the 32-bit 
> addressing limit and also because this technology was aimed 
> at the mobile market (read: who is going to have files on 
> their laptops > 2 GB).  I understand that there are several 
> shops that use this technology beyond the laptop environment.
> Ultimately, the solution is to have a 64-bit subsystem in 
> place so that we can go beyond 4 GB.  I suggest a requirement 
> to Tivoli if this is important to your shop.
>  
> The low-end limit (1024 bytes) was due to some strange 
> behavior with really small files, e.g., if a file started out 
> at 5 k and then was truncated to 8 bytes.  The solution was 
> to just send the entire file if the file fell below the 1k 
> threshold.  We can get away with resending these small files 
> because ... they are small files!  It is probably a wash to 
> resend or to try to correctly send a delta file in this case.
>  
> Hope this helps.
>  
> - Jim
>  
> J.P. (Jim) Smith
> TSM Client Development
> smithjp AT us.ibm DOT com <mailto:smithjp%20AT%20us.ibm%20DOT%20com> 
> 
>  
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • AW: Sub-File Backup - 2 GB Limit, Salak Juraj <=