ADSM-L

Re: Storage pool

2004-11-07 20:36:16
Subject: Re: Storage pool
From: "Hashim, Shukrie BSP-ISM/116" <Shukrie.Hashim AT SHELL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:36:01 +0800
Yes there are alot more nodes on that stgpool than the other .. one ... if I 
switch off collocation .. will it be ok .. will TSM and the data .. on TSM be 
OK ?

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Suad Musovich
Sent: 08 November 2004 09:16
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Storage pool


Are there more nodes/filespaces defined using that stgpool?
Maybe you want to switch off collocation for that stgpool.

Cant really say beyond that as you have supplied little extra info.

Cheers, Suad
--
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 08/11/2004
02:02:26 PM:
> Hi all,
>
> I have 3 storage pool 3494pool01, 3494pool02 and 3494pool03 (examples)
>
> My question is why is there alot of tapes that are 'FILLING' status
> in my 3494pool01 rather than .. in the 3494pool03 and 3494pool03
> needs more tapes that 3494pool01. sometimes when I put in the
> scratch tapes into the library .. most of the scratch tapes are
> defined into the 3494pool01. how can resolve this.
>
> My thoery is it because ... of the Maximum scratch allowed ?
>
> Regards
> Shukrie

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>