Re: RECLAMATION
2004-10-18 16:10:50
Howdy Folks,
Anyone noticed you can't do decimals... Like 96.5 or 99.9 . I know <1% is
not going to make a difference, but hey I have found where they do and can
come in handy sometimes... I think this would make a nice to have feature.
I think the IDEAL pct for reclamation really depends on ur system
environment(performance and tape drive usage) and personal taste.
I think 65% is very respectable #, but the way I understand reclamation is
that anything 51% is technically okay. I don't think there would be any
folks out there using this #... maybe..
Sung Y. Lee
"Lepre, James"
<JLEPRE AT NECA DOT ORG>
Sent by: "ADSM: To
Dist Stor ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Manager" cc
<[email protected]
.EDU> Subject
Re: RECLAMATION
10/18/2004 03:54
PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
What is the IDEAL pct for reclamation, I use 65pct should I go lower
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Hart, Charles
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:51 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: RECLAMATION
Here's one
select count(*) from volumes where pct_reclaim>95 and
stgpool_name='TAPE_DR_COPY'
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Richard Hammersley
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:43 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: RECLAMATION
James,
Do a "query volume" and look at the "pct util" column for the tapes
offsite. Compare that value with the Reclamation Threshold for your
pool. If there are a lot of tapes that meet that threshold and they
don't come back when they should then you should look to make sure the
reclamation is running when it should and if it is running to
completion.Reclamation Threshold
Richard
James Lepre wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>
>
> I am having problem with reclamation. Tapes are not being recycled as
>they should be. For instance I used get back about 100 tapes per week,
>now I am getting back 16. Any suggestions?
>
>
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: RECLAMATION, James Lepre
- Re: RECLAMATION, Coats, Jack
- Re: RECLAMATION, Hart, Charles
- Re: RECLAMATION, Lepre, James
- Re: RECLAMATION, Richard Sims
- Re: RECLAMATION, William Rosette
- Re: RECLAMATION, Jones, Eric J
- Re: RECLAMATION, Warren, Matthew (Retail)
|
|
|