ADSM-L

Re: Tape/Copypool poll results.

2004-10-15 15:13:39
Subject: Re: Tape/Copypool poll results.
From: asr AT UFL DOT EDU
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:13:19 -0400
==> In article <64340B968721F546A08F84EE98FEDFC01561AD AT usuexch03.usunwired 
DOT com>, Mark Bertrand <Mark.Bertrand AT USUNWIRED DOT COM> writes:


> Out of the 11 responses:

> Tape pool averages

> 6 tapepools

> Copy pool averages

> 4 copypools

> Thanks all who responded.


Dang.

I knew I had a system more complex than many, but I didn't think I was that
far out on the tail.

My mostly-decommissioned "old" server has 19 tape pools in use, and 19 copy
pools.  We were definitely over 40 in full operation.

I'm coalescing at the moment, so each of the five or six server instances
currently serving my client machines has 2-3 tape pools and 2-3 copy pools.


- Allen S. Rout

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>