Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494
2004-10-01 16:37:35
==> In article <2D1B4409AA3D70448EAE39C5731E891303D18B34 AT ntxboimbx01.micron
DOT com>, Ben Bullock <bbullock AT MICRON DOT COM> writes:
> Won't I be OK having the 3590 and 3592 drives in the same scratch and
> private categories? The TSM server is smart enough to know which scratch
> tapes can go in which drives... No? Is that a wrong assumption on my part?
I think the 3494 will fail to mount them (i.e. won't attempt it) , but TSM
doesn't care, they're just volumes.
Check them in in the right devclass, and all will be good.
- Allen S. Rout
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Adding 3592's to a 3494, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, Ben Bullock
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, Matthew Glanville
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, Ben Bullock
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, Ben Bullock
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, Ben Bullock
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, Ben Bullock
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, Robert Clark
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, CORP Rick Willmore
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, Ben Bullock
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: Adding 3592's to a 3494, Ben Bullock
|
|
|