ADSM-L

Re: First questions on 3584

2004-08-23 16:01:52
Subject: Re: First questions on 3584
From: fred johanson <fred AT MIDWAY.UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 15:02:30 -0500
Thanks to all who offered help here.  The solution turned out to be
straightforward as well as embarrassing.  There was nothing wrong with the
configuration or the fact that TSM was running under an ID other than
root.  All the volumes had been entered into the library correctly and
checked in with CHECKLABEL=BARCODE.  So all should have worked.

What happened was that the vendor interpreted "labelled" in a different way
when supplying 3592 cartridges.  Over the last eight years, we've placed
about a dozen orders for cartridges with 3 or 4 vendors, including the
present one, for 3590 cartridges "labelled".  This has always meant barcode
and internal label.  It appears that for 3592, that means "labelled and
initialized".  So we checked them all out and ran the LABEL LIBV on the
batch and all is fine.


At 05:21 PM 8/11/2004 -0500, you wrote:
When you say "But as of 5 this afternoon, TSM will not talk to the library. "
Do you mean to say that you have defined and configured the library and
the drives, and that when you try to mount a tape it does not do anything?

Can you post the q dr f=d & q path f=d output?
If you have successfully defined the library and the drives with the paths
then the only reason that the drives don't respond is if you have the
element numbers mixed up.

Do let me know when you get it working

Rajesh Oak
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kauffman, Tom" <KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT COM>
Date:         Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:52:25 -0500
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: First questions on 3584

> Fred --
>
> Which 3584? And tape drives?
>
> From the sound of it, your library is currently configured as six
> logical libraries with one drive each (the smcx is the library control
> -- on a 3584, this will be on the lowest-numbered tape drive as lun 1).
>
> OTOH, if you have the new L52/D52 with either LTO-2 or 3592 drives, this
> MAY be what things look like if you purchased the control path failover
> feature (we didn't, so I have no clue :-)
>
> In any case -- try defining all six drives and just /dev/smc0 to TSM --
> and make sure that the element numbers match to the correct rmt numbers.
> The fiber-attach LTO drives get a wwn based on serial number of the
> 3584, the frame, and the drive number or slot within the frame.
>
> I cabled (fibered?) my odd-numbered drives to one switch and the
> even-numbered drives to the other - with the result that rmt1 is drive
> 1, rmt 2 is drive 6, rmt 3 is drive 2, and so on. Drove me nutz until I
> figured out what happened. Use 'lsattr -El rmtx' to get the wwn for the
> remote.
>
> I don't see why TSM shouldn't be able to run as non-root; the device
> files are all rw-rw-rw (on my system -- "crw-rw-rwT root system") so
> anyone should be able to scribble on them.
>
> Some examples from defining my system:
>
> Def libr alex libt=scsi       (basic library def)
> Def path adsm alex srct=serv dest=libr device=/dev/smc0   (path from
> 'adsm' to 'alex' -- we adopted the default for our server name long ago)
>
> Def dr alex drive_01 elem=257 (drive_01 in alex is element 257, drive
> 1 in the 3584)
>
> Def path adsm drive_01 srct=serv destt=drive libr=alex device=/dev/rmt1
> (from 'adsm' to 'drive_01' in 'alex' is by way of '/dev/rmt1')
>
> Def dr alex drive_02 elem=258
> Def path adsm drive_02 srct=serv destt=drive libr=alex device=/dev/rmt3
> (that's the funky numbering from my switch cabling coming into play)
>
> Try plugging that much into TSM and see if he can find the library ond
> both drives.
>
> Another thought -- you HAVE installed the Atape device driver, haven't
> you? Here's what I've got from lsdev -Cc tape:
>
> rmt1  Available 91-08-01     IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
> smc0  Available 91-08-01     IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)
> rmt2  Available 91-08-01     IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
> rmt3  Available 91-08-01     IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
> rmt4  Available 91-08-01     IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
> rmt5  Available 91-08-01     IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
> rmt6  Available 91-08-01     IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
> rmt7  Available 91-08-01     IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
> rmt8  Available 91-08-01     IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
> rmt9  Available 91-08-01     IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
> rmt10 Available 91-08-01     IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
> rmt11 Available 7D-08-01     IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
>
> Hope this gives you a starting point --
>
> Tom Kauffman
> NIBCO, Inc
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
> > Of Fred Johanson
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:38 PM
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject: First questions on 3584
> >
> > Last week, my new 3584 was installed, which is to be the dedicated
> > library for
> > a closed TSM system running on a P615 with the latest version of AIX,
> > Atape,
> > and TSM 5.2.2.5.  As of Friday afternoon, AIX could mount a tape, via
> > tapeutil.  But as of 5 this afternoon, TSM will not talk to the
> > library.  The
> > documentation is sketchy, to be generous, so I look for aid.
> >
> > My first two questions are that the OS sees, via lsdev -Cc tape, a
> > one-to-one
> > relationship between /dev/rmtx and /dev/scmx.  Does this mean that i
> > define one
> > library, or six?  If one, which scmx to use?  Or is there a problem in
> > the way
> > the library is configured?  Whether or not we have the configuration
> > right, to
> > keep the security guys happy, we've installed TSM to run under its own
> > ID
> > instead of root.  Is there some problem with this, like the TSM user
> > id not
> > having access to the drives?
> >
> > Having grown considerably greyer today, I knew there was a reason I
> > wanted
> > another 3494.
> >
> >
> > Fred Johanson
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance upon this message. If you have received this in error, please
notify us immediately by return email and promptly delete this message
and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.

--
_______________________________________________
Find what you are looking for with the Lycos Yellow Pages
http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10

Fred Johanson
ITSM Administrator
University of Chicago
773-702-8464

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>