Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?
2004-07-26 19:27:13
So, how high do you set your file class reclaim percentage? If its that fast
you should be able to cope with 20% free or less before reclaim.
Steve.
>>> tsm_user AT YAHOO DOT COM 27/07/2004 9:12:33 >>>
Dito and that is how we implemented large disk backup solutions on ATA disk. We
use File device classes. We have found that the reclaim extremely fast, much
faster than tape.
"Rushforth, Tim" <TRushforth AT WINNIPEG DOT CA> wrote:
You can run reclamation with D2D by using Devicetype=file on disk.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse Dotterer [mailto:jdotterer AT SEPATON DOT COM]
Sent: July 23, 2004 10:54 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?
There are some other faster restore solutions out there. With Virtual
Tape Libraries you get all the speed and reliability of D2D but with all
the functionality of tape. For example, I happen to work for a company
that provides a VTL solution which is certified by IBM-TSM. There is no
way to run reclamation on D2D so that must be done once it is
transferred to real tape. With a VTL solution, you backup to a virtual
tape library and device, run the reclamation on that, which is nearly
instantaneous and then copy to real tape via archive and that saves you
hrs and hrs of reclamation time. The other benefit is the near
unlimited amount of mount points. With backups and restores, the speed
of real tape and libraries are not longer your bottleneck.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
***********************************************************************************
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for the
sole use of the intended recipient(s). This confidentiality is not waived or
lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), or if it is
transmitted/received in error.
Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this
email is prohibited. It may be subject to a statutory duty of confidentiality
if it relates to health service matters.
If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this email in
error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by return
email. You should also delete this email and destroy any hard copies produced.
***********************************************************************************
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?, Stapleton, Mark
- Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?, MC Matt Cooper (2838)
- Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?, Jesse Dotterer
- Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?, Rushforth, Tim
- Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?,
Steve Harris <=
- Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?, Rushforth, Tim
- Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?, Rushforth, Tim
- Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?, Rushforth, Tim
- Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?, Troy Frank
- Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?, Rushforth, Tim
- Re: D2D vs. tape backups with TSM?, Richard Sims
|
|
|