ADSM-L

Re: Loopback server to server and backupsets

2004-06-23 10:06:03
Subject: Re: Loopback server to server and backupsets
From: "Rushforth, Tim" <TRushforth AT WINNIPEG DOT CA>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:05:43 -0500
http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0306/23.html

I tried this once and the volumes were not expiring properly.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Harris [mailto:Steve_Harris AT HEALTH.QLD.GOV DOT AU]
Sent: June 23, 2004 12:06 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Loopback server to server and backupsets

Well,

The contracts have now been signed and I can speak freely.

I'm looking to push TSM to as many sites as possible in our vast distributed
network.  Those that I can't service with TSM will come to appreciate the
qualities of Backup Exec.

We will be replacing either Backup Exec or Arcserve in many of the TSM
sites, and the site managers are used to having the usual GFS arrangement.
They even take the occasional monthly backup out of the cycle and keep it
forever, because this provides a way to appear to comply with ridiculous
mandated data retention requirements without having to actually think about
purge processes, application changes and so on.

Thus the reality is that I must provide monthly backup facilities within
TSM.  Many of these sites are quite small, and I'm hoping to get away with
35 days of backups on disk, with copypools on a tape that is changed weekly.
THere is no way that I can afford one tape per node per month for a
backupset.

So, I was  thinking of implementing server-to-server on the one machine so
that the backupset could be generated to virtual volumes and these stacked
on to one set of tapes per month.

I seem to recall seeing a problem with doing that on this list recently, but
I have been unable to find it there, or anything that is relevant in
quickfacts.

Is anyone doing loopback server-to-server, particularly on windows or linux
servers.  How well does it work?  Is it relatively easy to set up? Is it
practical to generate backupsets this way.

Any information will be appreciated.  the alternative is two TSM instances
in every site.


Thanks


Steve Harris
Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia


PS.  If anyone has a Groupwise -> tsm soultion out there, I'm very
interested.






****************************************************************************
*******
This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  This confidentiality is not
waived or lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s),
or if it is transmitted/received in error.

Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this
email is prohibited.  It may be subject to a statutory duty of
confidentiality if it relates to health service matters.

If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this email
in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone or by
return email.  You should also delete this email and destroy any hard copies
produced.
****************************************************************************
*******

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>