ADSM-L

Re: Manning ratios

2004-05-03 20:27:50
Subject: Re: Manning ratios
From: "Coats, Jack" <Jack.Coats AT BANKSTERLING DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 19:23:35 -0500
I do about 150 servers myself, and on occasion conscript someone else if I
am sick or on vacation.
The day to day stuff I do in about half a day.  We have a few big servers
but mostly smallish ones,
and the only desktops are for systems support (testing, NOC, etc).  To do it
'right', if I had
reporting automated, I could do it in 4 o 6 hours per day.  Currently I take
to many shortcuts to
call it 'right' (I have other duties, too).

Speaking of sick, the weather is very nice today and half my group,
supervisor included, called in sick. ... hmmmm ;)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Harris [SMTP:Steve_Harris AT HEALTH.QLD.GOV DOT AU]
> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 6:41 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Manning ratios
>
> Hi List,
>
> We are looking at possibly installing a large number of TSM servers, some
> unix but mostly windows to back up our geographically dispersed
> infrastructure.
> (Queensland is in the north east of Australia, about the same length as
> California, but much wider and has approaching 4 million people, mostly
> along the east coast)
> There are half-a-dozen big sites, 50 medium, and 150 small.  Most clients
> are windows servers (no desktop) and novell/groupwise.  We have comms to
> all sites, but some of the more isolated ones are only 64Kb.
>
> We intend to set up as centralized control and reporting as we can.
>
> OK.  Given that scenario, how many people will we need?  What is the tsm
> admin to server ratio in your shops?  Alternatively, how much time as a
> percentage of a person does it take to manage a medium size or small TSM
> server?
>
>
> Many thanks
>
> Steve.
> AIX and TSM Admin
> Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia
>
>
>
>
> **************************************************************************
> *********
> This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  This confidentiality is
> not waived or lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended
> recipient(s), or if it is transmitted/received in error.
>
> Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of
> this email is prohibited.  It may be subject to a statutory duty of
> confidentiality if it relates to health service matters.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient(s), or if you have received this
> email in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by
> telephone or by return email.  You should also delete this email and
> destroy any hard copies produced.
> **************************************************************************
> *********

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>