However, what isn't mentioned is that many seem to be suffering
memory problems with TSAFS, and some (myself included) have had to
make the choice between memory leaks/abends depending on the version
in use.  I can't use TSA5UP13.EXE as a patch, I'm using tsa5up12.exe
which has a later tsafsnlm, but leaks rather than crashes.

TSA600 seems to be rather more stable - but true, the performance
isn't as good.

Tom

On 28 Apr 2004 at 14:23, Wolfgang Bayrhof wrote:

> Hi Robert,
>
> maybe you'll find Novell's TID 10089687 interesting.
>
>  http://support.novell.com/cgi-bin/search/searchtid.cgi?/10089687.htm
>
> Best regards,
> Wolfgang Bayrhof
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Robert Ouzen <rouzen AT UNIV.HAIFA.AC DOT IL>
> Date:         Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:09:48 +0200
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Tsa600.nlm against tsafs.nlm
>
> > Hi to all
> >
> > Can anybody explain to me the difference between TSA600.NLM and
> > TSAFS.NLM on a Netware version 6.x.
> >
> > I load once with tsa600 and run a  q tsa
> >      tsa module name:     TSA600.nlm
> >      tsa version:              6.54.0
> >      smdr version:           6.54.0
> >      user/password valid:  yes
> >
> > I load once with tsafs and run a  q tsa
> >      tsa module name:     TSAFS.nlm
> >      tsa version:              6.54.0
> >      smdr version:           6.54.0
> >      user/password valid:  yes
> >
> > In two cases my backup run O.K but curious to know the difference if
> > any
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Robert Ouzen
> > E-mail: rouzen AT unniv.haif.ac DOT il
> >
>


==============================
Tom Anstey
Institute of Molecular Medicine
Oxford University
Oxford OX3 9DS
UK