ADSM-L

Re: Configuration and Expansion questions

2004-02-09 19:27:17
Subject: Re: Configuration and Expansion questions
From: Luke Dahl <ldahl AT JPL.NASA DOT GOV>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:26:51 -0800
We've got our 3494 library connected via rs232 as well as LAN - no problems 
there.

Luke

Steve Harris wrote:

> Can't the 3494 be configured to communicate via rs232 as well as LAN?
>
> That might satisfy the requirement in this case.
>
> Steve Harris
> AIX and TSM Admin
> Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia
>
> >>> Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU 10/02/2004 5:01:26 >>>
> Hi Zoltan...
>
> That's a stumper.   I'll throw out a guess for people to stab at.
>
> Appears to me that the 3494 is not an option.
>
> Your Windows TSM server will need to communicate with the 3494 via LAN
> (TCPIP), just as your AIX box does.  Or with TSM  library sharing, it has to
> communicate with the other AIX TSM server (the library master) via TCPIP.  I
> don't see how that would work if the Windows TSM server is outside the
> firewall?
>
> I believe you could make it work by physically sharing the 3494, if you
> added NIC cards to the AIX & Windows box and set up a "3494-net", where only
> the AIX host and the Windows host and the 3494 were on that network segment,
> but that would require more E1A drives dedicated to the Windows host, in
> addition to the NICS ....(very costly).
>
> Maybe I'm making this more complicated than it has to be, but I would look
> into physical partitioning of the 3583, available on the later 3583 models.
> That would give you a solution that doesn't require TCP/IP, avoiding the
> firewall issues.
>
> Also beware, make sure you will have sufficient cartridge capacity in the
> 3583 - the "(and growing)" in your post makes me think 72 slots might not be
> enough for TWO systems of indeterminate size.  You may need to go to the
> 3584.
>
> OK, somebody else shoot it down...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:zforray AT VCU DOT EDU]
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 1:31 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Configuration and Expansion questions
>
> We are working on expanding our TSM systems with additional TSM servers,
> libraries, etc.
>
> Here is what we have right now and where we are heading....
>
> (1) TSM on ZOS using IBM 3494 ATL
> (2) TSM on AIX sharing the 3494 but using its own 3590E1A drives attached
> to a SAN via FC
>
> New system #3
>
> TSM on AIX (primarily for IMAGE and mail systems/Notes/Domino backups)
> with a 3583-L72 LTO2 library
>
> New system #4
>
> The need has arisen for a new TSM server, dedicated to backing up 17 (and
> growing) systems/servers (sizes unknown......don't ask). The reason for a
> new, separate TSM server is due to firewall issues/requirements. The TSM
> server is going to be behind the firewall with NO outside access (I will
> have to physically walk to and directly access the TSM server. No internet
> access....no dual-heading......).
>
> To make things simpler/cheaper, we are proposing #4 to be an x86 box with
> WINDOWS 2003 server (thought about Linux but I think the issue was the
> availability of an FC card for it). We want to access/share the 3590E1A
> drives and/or the LTO2 library.
>
> What are you thoughts on this ?
>
> Anyone have this kind of configuration ?
>
> Is this possible/workable ?
>
> What will I need, software wise from TSM ?  Library Sharing (never done
> one of these !).
>
> ***********************************************************************************
> This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential and for 
> the sole use of the intended recipients(s).  This confidentiality is not 
> waived or lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s), 
> or if it is transmitted/received in error.
>
> Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review of this 
> email is prohibited.  It may be subject to a statutory duty of 
> confidentiality if it relates to health service matters.
>
> If you are not the intended recipients(s), or if you have received this 
> e-mail in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone 
> or by return e-mail.  You should also delete this e-mail message and destroy 
> any hard copies produced.
> ***********************************************************************************