Re: 3494
2003-12-22 10:32:12
Not sure of the price Diff, but we are in the midst of 3590 > 3592's and the
3592's really rock. We are seeing 169GB an hour for our 3590 - 3592 Move
data's(faster from 3592 to 3592) and our Unix Data is seeing tape sizes from
900Gb toi 1 TB.
M00022 TAPE_APP_B- 3592TAPE 900,000.0 2.4
Filling
ACKUP
M00023 TAPE_APP_B- 3592TAPE 900,000.0 3.6
Filling
ACKUP
M00025 TAPE_DR_CO- 3592TAPE 900,000.0 2.5
Filling
PY
M00026 TAPE_DR_CO- 3592TAPE 1,232,573 99.7
Full
PY .7
M00027 TAPE_BACKU- 3592TAPE 1,075,622 98.5
Full
-----Original Message-----
From: Francois Chevallier [mailto:Francois.CHEVALLIER AT CCMX DOT FR]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:27 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: 3494
I have a 3494 with Magstar tapes 3590 and I would like to use a 3584 with
LTO tapes . What do you think about this choice (fiability,reliability..) .
Kind regards
François Chevallier
Parc Club du Moulin à Vent
33 av G Levy
69200 - Vénissieux
tél : 04 37 90 40 56
|
|
|