Could you provide me with the direct link to this manual? I can't seem to
find it... I'm using Google, but I'm not having any luck. Thanks!
***************************************************************
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems
Work:(717)302-6603 **New as of 11/1/03
Fax:(717)302-5974
joni.moyer AT highmark DOT com
***************************************************************
Steve Roder
<spr AT REXX.ACSU DOT BU
FFALO.EDU> To
Sent by: "ADSM: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Dist Stor cc
Manager"
<[email protected] Subject
.EDU> Re: 2 fibre interfaces per drive
11/18/2003 02:46
PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
<[email protected]
.EDU>
> Our 3590H's are dual attached to our TSM server via separate FC switches.
> It does work as described below. I checked the atape manual . . . it
> describes exactly what we've implemented.
Ok. Cool. But, I am looking at Pub GC35-0154-11 (IBM TotalStorage Tape
Device Drivers Installation and User's Guide), and the Notes at the bottom
of page 25, in the Automatic Failover section of Chapter 6 "Alternate
Pathing Support" states:
"This function is supported only on 3590 and 3592 Fibre Channel tape
drives that are native attached. This function is not supported for
devices that are attached through an IBM San Data Gateway."
If course, I perfer to believe that it will work!
>
> Rick
>
>
>
>
>
> Steve Roder
> <spr AT REXX.ACSU DOT BU To:
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> FFALO.EDU> cc:
> Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Re: 2 fibre
interfaces per drive
> Dist Stor
> Manager"
> <[email protected]
> .EDU>
>
>
> 11/18/2003 12:02
> PM
> Please respond to
> "ADSM: Dist Stor
> Manager"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For the below to work, the book says that the devices have to be directly
> attached to the HBA's. Has anyone tried configuring alternate path
> support for SAN attached 3590-H's? The book says that it is not
> supported.
>
>
> > A recent version of Atape is required for dual path support. We use
> > Atape 8.3.1.0.
> >
> > You also need to enable alternative pathing support on the rmt device
> which,
> > I think is set to off by default:
> > i.e. chdev -l <device> -a alt_pathing=yes
> > Then when you make the devices available to the host you will notice
> > twice the number of drives. If you look at the device attributes with
> > lsattr -El rmtx
> > you will notice the location code xx-xx-xx-ALT or PRI ,
> > the primary device value and the WWN. The latter will be
> 0xnnnnnnnnnn4nnnnn for
> > the primary device and 0xnnnnnnnnnn8nnnnn for the alternative device.
> > These allow you to 'pair' up the devices.
> >
> > If you have more than 3 or 4 tape devices I would recommend you employ
a
> naming
> > convention to the devices to make these pairs more transparent, by
> renaming them
> > after cfgmgr has brought them into the system.
> > Thus, we do a rmdev -l <rmtX> ; chdev -l <rmtX> -a new_name=rmtY
> > such that the secondary / Alternative device name is 50 greater than
> primary
> > device name - i.e:
> > rmt2 => rmt52
> > rmt3 => rmt53 and so on.
> >
> > Note that errpt will log errors against both device names, depending on
> which
> > interface the drive was being accessed when the error occurred.
> >
> > Finally, our experience tallies with Steve Harris' - failover is
seamless
> > - we pulled the active cable from a drive while backing up (test !)
> client
> > data to tape and the backup carried on over the other path. TSM didn't
> blink.
> > We subsequently audited the tape and all was OK.
> >
> > Regards
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Ian Smith
> > Oxford University Computing Services, Oxford, UK.
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ~>Mime-Version: 1.0
> > ~>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> > ~>Content-Disposition: inline
> > ~>Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:48:41 +1000
> > ~>From: Steve Harris <Steve_Harris AT HEALTH.QLD.GOV DOT AU>
> > ~>Subject: Re: 2 fibre interfaces per drive
> > ~>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > ~>X-Oxmail-Spam-Status: score=0.0 tests=> ~>X-Oxmail-Spam-Level:
> > ~>
> > ~>Joni,
> > ~>
> > ~>Later versions of the Atape driver support dual pathing and failover.
> > ~>Once set up, AIX defines two RMTn drives for each physical drive, one
> with a
> > device path ending in -PRI and the other in -ALT.
> > ~>
> > ~>As I understand it rudimentary load balancing is done - when the tape
> is
> > opened, the least busy path is used.
> > ~>
> > ~>Failover is also neat. I was running the tapeutil test command and
> > deliberately varied off the adapter in use. The io just picked up
where
> it left
> > off on the other path.
> > ~>
> > ~>See the Totalstorage Tape Installation and Users Guide, available
from
> > ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com for details
> > ~>
> > ~>Steve Harris
> > ~>AIX and TSM Admin
> > ~>Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia
> > ~>
> > ~>>>> Julian.Armendariz AT HBFULLER DOT COM 18/11/2003 7:13:13 >>>
> > ~>IBM 3590 and 3592 drives have 2 fibre interfaces. I am unsure how to
> > ~>manage the multipathing yet, but we are going to look at configuring
> our
> > ~>3590H drives that way next year to eliminate that single point of
> > ~>failure. Our TSM server is running AIX 5.2ML2 which is connected to
a
> > ~>3494 library with 4 3590H drives which are connected to a Brocade
2800.
> > ~>
> > ~>
> > ~>Julian Armendariz
> > ~>System Engineer - UNIX
> > ~>H.B. Fuller
> > ~>(651) 236-4043
> > ~>
> > ~>
> > ~>
> > ~>>>> joni.moyer AT HIGHMARK DOT COM 11/17/03 12:48PM >>>
> > ~>Hi everyone!
> > ~>
> > ~>We are in the process of formulating an AIX environment instead of
our
> > ~>current MVS TSM environment. We would have 2 TSM servers (one being
> > ~>the
> > ~>library manager) with 2 directors, 8 lan-free clients and 24 tape
> > ~>drives,
> > ~>which we hope to share between the 2 TSM servers. We would like to
> > ~>have 2
> > ~>fibre interfaces per drive in order to eliminate a single point of
> > ~>failure.
> > ~>My question is, how does TSM know which path it is using to the drive
> > ~>and
> > ~>how does it know that one of the paths to an individual drive is
> > ~>already in
> > ~>use? Is there software out there to manage this or is it done
through
> > ~>the
> > ~>hardware configuration? If anyone has any suggestions I would
> > ~>appreciate
> > ~>it! Thanks!
> > ~>
> > ~>
> > ~>***************************************************************
> > ~>Joni Moyer
> > ~>Highmark
> > ~>Storage Systems
> > ~>Work:(717)302-6603 **New as of 11/1/03
> > ~>Fax:(717)302-5974
> > ~>joni.moyer AT highmark DOT com
> > ~>***************************************************************
> > ~>
> > ~>
> > ~>
> >
>
~>******************************************************************************
>
> > *****
> > ~>This email, including any attachments sent with it, is confidential
and
> for
> > the sole use of the intended recipients(s). This confidentiality is
not
> waived
> > or lost, if you receive it and you are not the intended recipient(s),
or
> if it
> > is transmitted/received in error.
> > ~>
> > ~>Any unauthorised use, alteration, disclosure, distribution or review
of
> this
> > email is prohibited. It may be subject to a statutory duty of
> confidentiality
> > if it relates to health service matters.
> > ~>
> > ~>If you are not the intended recipients(s), or if you have received
this
> e-mail
> > in error, you are asked to immediately notify the sender by telephone
or
> by
> > return e-mail. You should also delete this e-mail message and destroy
> any hard
> > copies produced.
> >
>
~>******************************************************************************
>
> > *****
> >
> >
>
> Steve Roder, University at Buffalo
> HOD Service Coordinator
> VM Systems Programmer
> UNIX Systems Administrator (Solaris and AIX)
> TSM/ADSM Administrator
> UB DNS Team
> (spr AT buffalo DOT edu | (716)645-3564)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
us immediately, and delete the original message.
>
>
Steve Roder, University at Buffalo
HOD Service Coordinator
VM Systems Programmer
UNIX Systems Administrator (Solaris and AIX)
TSM/ADSM Administrator
UB DNS Team
(spr AT buffalo DOT edu | (716)645-3564)
|
