ADSM-L

Re: different backup policy on single node?

2003-11-14 11:12:54
Subject: Re: different backup policy on single node?
From: David McClelland <David.McClelland AT REUTERS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:59:31 +0000
Hmmm, interesting. The 'backups' table in TSM tells us which management
class an object is bound to. For example, a 'select * from  backups'
gives us useful things which include:

NODE_NAME, FILESPACE_NAME, BACKUP_DATE and most importantly for you,
CLASS_NAME

You could put together a select query and check that the CLASS_NAME is
correct - for example, if you've just implemented this, the simplest
test would be:

select * from backups where class_name='<your OS X mgmtclass name>'

Very crude - you might want to modify this to satisfy yourself that it's
working properly.

Rgds,

David McClelland
Global Management Systems, Reuters Ltd., London


-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Lazarevich [mailto:alazarev AT ITG.UIUC DOT EDU] 
Sent: 14 November 2003 15:54
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: different backup policy on single node?


Cool, thanks. made the change, backed up the filespace. But how can I
verify that the include statement has put that filespace into a new
management class? Nothing in the actlog about management class. A 'q
file xxx xxx format=detail' doesn't tell me either.

I could verify by deleting temp files on the filespace and see if they
get blown away from the server according to the new management class,
but there's got to be a better way to tell?

Thanks!

Alex

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, David McClelland wrote:

> Alexander,
>
> How about using the include exclude list on the Linux client to 
> specify a different management class for the filespec in which the OSX

> clients have their filespaces mounted?
>
> e.g. include /mnt/macclientmount/.../* MAC_MGMTCLASS
>
> Where MAC_MGMTCLASS as defined on the server might have the policy 
> that you wish for your Mac files.
>
> Rgds,
>
> David McClelland
> Global Management Systems, Reuters Ltd., London
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Lazarevich [mailto:alazarev AT ITG.UIUC DOT EDU]
> Sent: 14 November 2003 15:04
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: different backup policy on single node?
>
>
> TSM 5.1 on Windows 2K server with Overland Neo 4100 LTO2. Windows, 
> unix, mac clients.
>
> We nfs mount OS X workspaces onto our Linux fileserver, and back them 
> up from there. We do that because, frankly, the TSM OS X scheduler is 
> terrible. And since there is no command line for the TSM OS X client, 
> we can't run the scheduler on OS X with cron. (what is IBM thinking?)
>
> Anyway, we now want different policies for the OS X nfs mounts and the

> other filesystems on the linux client. But I don't see any way of 
> getting this done in TSM, it just wasn't designed that way.
>
> But is there any backdoor way to accomplish that? I just need a way to

> have different filespaces on a single client belong to different 
> policies?
>
> Or is there any version of the OS X TSM client that actually can run 
> via command line?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Alex
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>         Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
>
> Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more 
> information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual 
> sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be the 
> views of Reuters Ltd.
>


-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.