Sorry to bother you again.
I mentioned the small file/directory file speedups here as a reason to
upgrade, but I cannot find the APAR that appears to fix that. Do you
know the APAR number for that fix so I can read the text? Thanks.
Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_
Senior Technical Specialist ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_
BJC Health Care |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_)
Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Wheelock, Michael D wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not that I am aware of if you are currently patched up in 5.1. The one
> speed increase I saw was the speedup of the cached disk pool with small
> files (ie. For directory info to a separate diskpool, etc). That is
> available in a patch to 5.1 as well. We went to 5.2 for many reasons, not
> the least of which was full support of our windows 2003 active directory
> systems (and soon our exchange 2003 systems). Additionally, 5.2 is
> supported on AIX 5.2 (which due to the fastt) was our os version of choice.
>
> Michael Wheelock
> Integris Health
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Carlson [mailto:andyc AT ANDYC.CARENET DOT ORG]
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 9:00 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: TSM v5.2 on AIX
>
>
> Are you saying there are significant speed increases in 5.2? Thanks for the
> info!
>
> Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_
> Senior Technical Specialist ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_
> BJC Health Care |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
> St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_)
> Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Wheelock, Michael D wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been running 5.2.0.0 on AIX 5.2ML1 for quite a while now (3-4
> > months) with no significant issues. Everything works well and is very
> > speedy. We decided on 5.2 because we were using fastt products for
> > disk storage and can dynamically increase their size (well it requires
> > a down...so it is loose versions of the word dynamic). I am getting
> > ready to go to 5.2.0.2 (I have been out for a couple of weeks) but
> > have not yet. Most of my clients (ie. Everything but the nt4 and aix
> > 4.3.3 clients) are at 5.2.x.x.
> >
> > Michael Wheelock
> > Integris Health of Oklahoma
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Carlson [mailto:andyc AT ANDYC.CARENET DOT ORG]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:53 AM
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject: Re: TSM v5.2 on AIX
> >
> >
> > Thanks - I didn't realize those levels were on the ftp server.
> >
> >
> > Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_
> > Senior Technical Specialist ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_
> > BJC Health Care |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
> > St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_)
> > Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Ochs, Duane wrote:
> >
> > > Haven't used it, but here is the link to 5.1.7.0
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/mainten
> > > an
> > > ce/ser
> > > ver/v5r1/AIX/LATEST/
> > >
> > > Patches.
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/patches
> > > /s
> > > erver/
> > > AIX/
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andy Carlson [mailto:andyc AT ANDYC.CARENET DOT ORG]
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:41 AM
> > > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > > Subject: TSM v5.2 on AIX
> > >
> > >
> > > What experiences have you had with V5.2, on AIX if possible? Was it
> > > 5.2.01 or 5.2.0.2? TSM support recommended going to 5.1.7.2, but I
> > > don't have the 5.1.7.0 media, but I have 5 copies of 5.2.0, so I was
> > > thinking about doing that instead. Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_
> > > Senior Technical Specialist ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_
> > > BJC Health Care |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
> > > St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_)
> > > Cat Pics: http://andyc.dyndns.org/animal.html
> > >
> > This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is
> > subject to protection under state and federal law. This information is
> > intended to be for the use of the individual named above. If you are
> > not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,
> > distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited
> > and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic
> > transmission in error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail
> > (reply).
> >
> This e-mail may contain identifiable health information that is subject to
> protection
> under state and federal law. This information is intended to be for the use
> of the
> individual named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that
> any
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information
> is prohibited
> and may be punishable by law. If you have received this electronic
> transmission in
> error, please notify us immediately by electronic mail (reply).
>
|
