ADSM-L

Re: TSM managed services

2003-09-20 15:34:10
Subject: Re: TSM managed services
From: "Marcel J.E. Mol" <marcel AT MESA DOT NL>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:20:26 +0200
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:17:45PM -0400, Wholey, Joseph (IDS DM&DS) wrote:
> Can anyone share some info on TSM managed services to address a Unix memory 
> leak.  i.e. have dsmcad start scheduler prior to backup and stop it after 
> backup.  My understanding is that the memory leak
> is actually a short coming of the Unix operating system architecture.  
> Apparently the scheduler aquires memory and does not release it.  Who 
> recommends managed services?  I'd like to hear.  thx.

I fail to see why this would be a unix memory leak. I think it is a scheduler
leak. The scheduler should take care of releasing memory it dos not need
anymore. How should unix know if the scheduler did not release unneede memory
(unless the scheduler quits).

Anyway, we had a problem that the scheduler started looping and took
100% cpu after a couple of days. IBM support advised us to use
the managed services setup andthings run fine with it for over a month
now.

-Marcel
--
     ======--------         Marcel J.E. Mol                MESA Consulting B.V.
    =======---------        ph. +31-(0)6-54724868          P.O. Box 112
    =======---------        marcel AT mesa DOT nl                 2630 AC  
Nootdorp
__==== www.mesa.nl ---____U_n_i_x______I_n_t_e_r_n_e_t____ The Netherlands ____
 They couldn't think of a number,           Linux user 1148  --  counter.li.org
    so they gave me a name!  -- Rupert Hine  --  www.ruperthine.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>