ADSM-L

Re: reorg offsite data - noncollocated to collocated

2003-09-10 10:58:46
Subject: Re: reorg offsite data - noncollocated to collocated
From: Allen Barth <allen.barth AT DB DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:52:43 -0500
This is a SERIOUS shortcoming of TSM, and something I've brought up 
several times over the past 6 years!  But the TSM folks just don't seem to 
get it.  I'll try again.  I believe the situation as presented in the 
original post, which comes up more and more often, could be solved easily 
if we could have the following:

allow a nodename= parameter to be specified on the MOVE DATA command. THIS 
IS NOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO MOVE NODEDATA!
Justification:  The design goal of TSM is to keep working.  If you have a 
stgpool with colocation=yes and, for whatever reason, you run out of 
scratch tapes, TSM will effectively undermine colocation by writing data 
to other tapes in the pool which are not full.  OK, great.  My backups ran 
and data got migrated, but my stgpool is somewhat non-colocated and not 
how it was designed.  Assuming more scratch tapes have been added, the 
solution is:  MOVE DATA tape-volx NODENAME=somenode

allow a copypool= parameter to be specified on the DELETE FILESPACE 
command.
Justification:  Due to business needs, data from some node(s) now goes to 
a new storage pool heirarchy.   You can do MOVE NODEDATA on the primary 
pool and then a BACKUP STGPOOL, but now we're left with 2 copies of data 
in copypools.  This is easily viewed as a waste of resources by management 
for both the copypool media and the increased amount of disk needed for 
the TSM database.  Solution: DELETE FILESPACE somenode some.fs.spec 
COPYPOOL=copypool

Thoughts?

Regards,
Al Barth




Henrik Wahlstedt <shwl AT STATOIL DOT COM>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
09/09/03 03:09 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

 
        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: reorg offsite data - noncollocated to collocated


Right! But expiration will take care of both copypools, only when primay
data will expire... until then you will have 2 copies...


Med vänlig hälsning
  
  
  
 Henrik Wahlstedt          Statoil                   Phone: +46 8 429 6325 
 
 KTJ IT NED SE1            Torkel Knutssonsgatan 24  Mobile: +46 70 429 
6325 
                           118 88 Stockholm          E-mail:  
                           Sverige Henrik.Wahlstedt AT statoil DOT com 
  




  
                    "Kamp, Bruce"  
                    <bkamp AT MHS DOT NE        To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT 
EDU      
 
                    T>                   cc:     (bcc: Henrik Wahlstedt)   
 
                    Sent by:             Subject:     Re: reorg offsite 
data - noncollocated to collocated 
                    "ADSM: Dist  
                    Stor Manager"  
                    <ADSM-L AT VM DOT MA  
                    RIST.EDU>  
  
  
                    2003-09-08  
                    18:52  
                    Please  
                    respond to  
                    "ADSM: Dist  
                    Stor Manager"  
  
  




I am going through this also.  The only way I could figure out was to let
expiration take care of it....


--------------------------------------
Bruce Kamp
Midrange Systems Analyst II
Memorial Healthcare System
E: bkamp AT mhs DOT net
P: (954) 987-2020 x4597
F: (954) 985-1404
---------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: i love tsm [mailto:ilovetsm AT HOTMAIL DOT COM]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:58 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU

Hi all

Hoping someone can help with this "opportunity" we have...

For a number of our existing clients we have changed them from using
non-collocated to collocated storage. Obviously the next step is to use 
the
move nodedata command to move the old primary data across into the new
primary collocated storage pool. This data will then get backed up to the
new collocated copy storage pool we've set up.

The problem is how do I delete the data for the nodes that will still
reside
in the old non-collocated copy storage pool.?   I don't want to use delete
volume because the data is spread over lots , i.e 70+, tapes, and these
tapes contain data for nodes we want to leave noncollocated.

Wish there was move nodedata command for copystgpools !

Any thoughts or ideas appreciated.

TIA

_________________________________________________________________
Find a cheaper internet access deal - choose one to suit you.
http://www.msn.co.uk/internetaccess




-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of 
the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and 
delete
this message.
Thank you.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>