ADSM-L

Re: using a tape drive attached to remote computer

2003-08-05 06:08:31
Subject: Re: using a tape drive attached to remote computer
From: Julius Loman <lomo AT KYBERIA DOT NET>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:08:15 +0200
hi

have you done something like this before ? I'd like to ask if it's
possible to use drives on other TSM server (for example TSM2), that is
used only to manage this single manual drive. Main tsm server (for
example TSM1) should use this drive for backups. 

Is it possible to define this drive directly on TSM1 ? (of course i have
to define it on TSM2 first) or i have to define pool on TSM2 and share
this pool in some way ?

thanks for any information

Regards

Julius

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:52:30AM +0300, Zlatko Krastev <acit AT ATTGLOBAL DOT 
NET> wrote:
> Your salesman is correct. From licensing perspective it does not matter is 
> the license for TSM server or for a client - it is a processor.
> >From technical point of view it is quite different - a 
> drive/autoloader/library (whatever storage device) can be managed only by 
> TSM server. Even a storage agent needs the server to mount a tape for it.
> So the answer to the main question is "No, you can attach the drive only 
> to a TSM server". However you can make to system with the drive a TSM 
> server and this wouldn't affect your licenses. It will only complicate 
> your infrastructure.
> The best way is to gather all drives from different boxes, connect them to 
> single system and use that system as TSM server. This would allow you to 
> benefit from multiple drives on all TSM clients.
> 
> Zlatko Krastev
> IT Consultant
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Julius Loman <lomo AT KYBERIA DOT NET>
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> 31.07.2003 21:39
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> 
>  
>         To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>         cc: 
>         Subject:        Re: using a tape drive attached to remote computer
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 11:25:19AM -0500, "Coats, Jack" 
> <Jack.Coats AT BANKSTERLING DOT COM> wrote:
> > Question: If you defined the remote computer (client with tape drive) as 
> a
> > server, 
> >   couldn't you use it as part of a 'remote storage pool'?
> probably yes, i will try it today and report if it is successfull..
> >   Under the new licensing scenario, would it cost more for the client 
> with a
> > tape drive over being just a 
> >   regular client computer?
> our salesman told me that is not important whether it is a server or a
> client.. only the CPU number affects the price
> but he could be wrong
> > 
> > Just trying to learn. 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:15 AM
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject: Re: using a tape drive attached to remote computer
> > 
> > 
> > No, sorry.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Julius Loman [mailto:lomo AT KYBERIA DOT NET] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:57 PM
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject: using a tape drive attached to remote computer
> > 
> > 
> > hi
> > 
> > i'd like to ask if it is possible to use a tape drive attached to a
> > remote computer, that is also a tsm client. Client platform is Solaris,
> > TSM Server is Linux, TSM version 5.2
> > 
> > regards
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > [ Julius Loman ][ lomo AT kyberia DOT net ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][
> > icq:35732873 ]
> > 
> > Sakra! Tygr mě shodil do tygří pasti! Nepředvídaný nezdar!
> 
> -- 
> 
> [ Julius Loman ][ lomo AT kyberia DOT net ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][ 
> icq:35732873 ]
> 
>  Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains? 
> 
> 



-- 

[ Julius Loman ][ lomo AT kyberia DOT net ][ http://lomo.kyberia.net ][ 
icq:35732873 ]

tohle není vyprávění. tohle není další příběh. to je jen další masakr.

Attachment: pgp5SGsLAHHFL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>